PDA

View Full Version : Round 7 - W.Force v Bulls



Dumbo
20-03-06, 04:09 AM
The Force (what Force, ranked last) take on the Bulls (5th on the ladder) at home.
Unless the Bull's are ****ful travellers it's an easy one for the Bulls (hard one for the Saffa's that are supporting the Force though)

Groen_en_Goud
20-03-06, 05:20 AM
I have decided that, even though I hate going to Subiaco Oval to watch Super 14 and vowing never to return, I have decided to break it, and go to the game.

Bulls by 20+ points!!!

Op die Bulle!!

The TRUTH
20-03-06, 05:48 AM
Originally posted by Groen_en_Goud@Mar 20 2006, 05:20 PM
I have decided that, even though I hate going to Subiaco Oval to watch Super 14 and vowing never to return, I have decided to break it, and go to the game.

Bulls by 20+ points!!!

Op die Bulle!!
You are a true Force fan ;)

Force by 10

Groen_en_Goud
20-03-06, 05:50 AM
1) I said I followed the Force ;)

2) Read my signature below :P

The TRUTH
20-03-06, 06:06 AM
Follow them where?

Anyway i think this game is a good chance for the Force to get there first win

The Bulls find it hard to score tries and with a few key players back for the Force i think we'll do it

The only way i see us losing is if we give away alot of penalties coz Hougaard can kick em from any where.

yes die bulle die! :P

Dumbo
20-03-06, 06:15 AM
Force to win? against the Bulls? serious?

The TRUTH
20-03-06, 06:21 AM
Originally posted by Dumbo@Mar 20 2006, 06:15 PM
Force to win? against the Bulls? serious?
Deadly

Rassie
20-03-06, 09:43 AM
When pigs will fly.... :D

Easy win for Bulls - 5 points in the bag!

Dumbo
21-03-06, 08:39 AM
The 'Force' are nothing… the should be sued for false advertising.

Rassie
21-03-06, 08:44 AM
Give them time! They played something against Reds. something very close to rugby!

Wally
21-03-06, 01:00 PM
They might not win this one but there is an upset in the works.

sanzar
21-03-06, 01:16 PM
Originally posted by Groen_en_Goud@Mar 20 2006, 04:50 PM
1) I said I followed the Force ;)

2) Read my signature below :P
:blink: What do you have against us Aussies?

Rassie
21-03-06, 01:35 PM
Besides the fact that you take advantages of innocent sheep...hmm, nothing... :D

Well, i can think of a number of reasons starting with the fact that your ancestors were pommie convicts u.s.w

Wally
21-03-06, 01:54 PM
I really don't know how you can justify ragging on Australia. I mean our country is better than your country in every way.

Better economy. More sunshine. Less poverty. Less black people. Better looking girls. Less pedophilia. Better beaches. Less sharks. More job oppurtunities. Better at sport. Less black people. Less crime. Less gay people. Higher life expectancy. Less black people.

Rassie
21-03-06, 02:19 PM
We are no longer a country! Use to until 94, after that....and btw there is no country in this world with more faggots than you!

woohoo
21-03-06, 05:25 PM
racist

All_Blacks_Hurricanes_Lions_Fan
21-03-06, 10:14 PM
Who, Rassie or Wally?

Dumbo
21-03-06, 10:33 PM
And who's right god dammit?

sanzar
22-03-06, 02:30 AM
Originally posted by Wally@Mar 22 2006, 12:54 AM
I really don't know how you can justify ragging on Australia. I mean our country is better than your country in every way.

Better economy. More sunshine. Less poverty. Less black people. Better looking girls. Less pedophilia. Better beaches. Less sharks. More job oppurtunities. Better at sport. Less black people. Less crime. Less gay people. Higher life expectancy. Less black people.
Yep, that pretty much sums up why yarpies hate us! That and we've won more RWC's than them even though Rugby is the 4th most played football code in Australia :bleh!: . Yarpies are pretty good at rugby, but what else? I think the commenwealth games has shown which country has the superior athletes overall :D .

sanzar
22-03-06, 02:31 AM
Originally posted by Rassie@Mar 22 2006, 01:19 AM
We are no longer a country! Use to until 94, after that....and btw there is no country in this world with more faggots than you!
Yeah I know... it all started when you bloody south african's started coming here with your gayness! Untill then every man in Australia looked like Merv Hughes.

esoj
22-03-06, 10:01 AM
force will struggle against one of the best teams in the comp. I will be shocked if the bulls lose.

Rassie
22-03-06, 10:11 AM
Well , it will be intersting to see Bulls supporters in Perth !

Rassie
22-03-06, 10:11 AM

The TRUTH
22-03-06, 11:03 AM
Originally posted by Rassie@Mar 22 2006, 10:11 PM
Well , it will be intersting to see Bulls supporters in Perth !
Yeah that will be fascinating Rass

Stormer
23-03-06, 08:52 AM
If Bulls lose they can kiss their semi final hopes goodbye.

Mr. Laxative
23-03-06, 09:03 AM
Force for a win. The bulls are one dimensional and even though their placing suggests it they are far from one of the best teams in the comp.

There is an upset every round. Last week it was the blues over brumbies, this week... you'll see.

Rassie
23-03-06, 09:07 AM
If Bulls are one dimensional then Force are no dimensional at all. They are still not a team. Of course everything it`s possible but i really doubt Force cand pull it through. My best guess is that Bulls will easy win this game even from the first half.

But, as you`ve put it, we`ll see! :D

sanzar
23-03-06, 11:10 AM
Originally posted by Rassie@Mar 23 2006, 08:07 PM
If Bulls are one dimensional then Force are no dimensional at all. They are still not a team. Of course everything it`s possible but i really doubt Force cand pull it through. My best guess is that Bulls will easy win this game even from the first half.

But, as you`ve put it, we`ll see! :D
I wouldn't say the Bull's will win easily... The Force may not have won a game, but their defensive record is actually pretty good! They just can't get on the board... ontop of that the Bull's haven't exactly been setting the feild alight with their brand of rugby and could fall into the trap of taking the Force too lightly.
IMO this game could well be a lot close than people think.

Rassie
23-03-06, 11:22 AM
Perhaps, huh, and what`s a relief i have to see smb`s still intrested in S14 cos since now i`ve been chatting only about League :D , but i`ve seen Force trashed so many times on home ground without any sign of improvement (there was a sparkle vs Reds tho).

I`m not saying they don`t stand a chance especially if Bulls are going to see this game as being won before the start. I really can`t see how Force is going to win if Bulls are playing as they`ve done it so far!

Groen_en_Goud
23-03-06, 01:40 PM
The Force still have a long way to go before they can beat the top sides of the Super 14. They deserve to be where they are at the moment. They might even be lucky to win one game by the end of the season. I have watched all the Force games and nothing has been out of the ordinary to me.

THE CHIROPRACTOR101
23-03-06, 02:03 PM
Originally posted by Dumbo@Mar 21 2006, 08:39 PM
The 'Force' are nothing… the should be sued for false advertising.
bwhahahahhaa...

we should sue the reds then for not having paul tito in there team


i like the force...and hope they do well,i like seeing new teams regardless of what big rugby critics say bout strechin aussies talent...they have an audience of 20,000 plus there to watch them!...the fact they have that support can only grant a better team in the near future

we havent yet seen them dismantled by a big whopping score and they are currently doing better then the cats who have more experienced players/management in the super comp history



but this is the bulls we are talking bout...an they are pretty ****** off about that call last week that couldve seen them win the game...im hoping for a close game but i reckon habana will wreck havoc on that backline..offensively and defensively

Rassie
23-03-06, 02:10 PM
i am stupid...and yes im south africa

Beat that ! :cheers:

THE CHIROPRACTOR101
23-03-06, 02:13 PM
hmmm...no no...u win rassie

Dumbo
24-03-06, 12:35 AM
Head to Head:
Vodacom Bulls: 15 Johan Roets, 14 Akona Ndungane, 13 JP Nel, 12 Wynand Olivier, 11 Bryan Habana, 10 Derick Hougaard, 9 Fourie du Preez, 8 Jacques Cronjé, 7 Pedrie Wannenburg, 6 Pierre Spies, 5 Victor Matfield, 4 Bakkies Botha, 3 Andries Human, 2 Gary Botha, 1 Jaco Engels.
Replacements: 16 Adriaan Strauss, 17 Danie Thiart, 18 Danie Rossouw, 19 Francois van Schouwenburg, 20 Heini Adams, 21 Morné Steyn, 22 Danwel Demas

Western Force: 15 Cameron Shepherd, 14 Haig Sare, 13 Josh Graham, 12 Scott Staniforth, 11 Digby Ioane, 10 James Hilgendorf, 9 Matt Henjak, 8 Richard Brown, 7 Matt Hodgson, 6 Luke Doherty, 5 Nathan Sharpe, 4 John Welborn, 3 David Fitter, 2 Tai McIsaac, 1 Gareth Hardy.
Replacements: 16 Brendan Cannon/Luke Holmes, 17 Angus Scott, 18 Pat O'Connor, 19 David Pusey, 20 Chris O'Young, 21 Scott Daruda/Brock James, 22 Gavin DeBartolo
--------------------------------
Who the hell is 10 James Hilgendorf?

THE CHIROPRACTOR101
24-03-06, 02:19 AM
he was part of the duo that came to taranaki last year and the year before...

allright player..i like digby ioane hes an awesome player..with a better forward pack he will score more tries

The TRUTH
24-03-06, 06:20 AM
Originally posted by Dumbo@Mar 24 2006, 12:35 PM
Who the hell is 10 James Hilgendorf?
You obviously havn't watched the Force play this year, he's been our best back.

I heard he won player of the year for Taranaki, well thats what all the comentators have been saying.

Anyway he's a great player,usually plays Fullback but i think it's a good idea having him at 10.

I think this is one of the best teams we've put out since round one, although im not sure why Cannon is on the bench.

I think we're gonna win in a close one

Dumbo
26-03-06, 02:09 AM
Score:
Bulls 30 (Fourie Du Preez, Pedrie Wannenburg, Akona Ndungane tries; Derick Hougaard 3 con, 3 pen)
Force 21 (Scott Staniforth 2, James Hilgendorf tries; Sheperd 3 con)

Ripper
26-03-06, 03:13 AM
Originally posted by The TRUTH!!+Mar 24 2006, 07:20 PM-->
<!--QuoteBegin-Dumbo@Mar 24 2006, 12:35 PM
Who the hell is 10 James Hilgendorf?
You obviously havn&#39;t watched the Force play this year, he&#39;s been our best back.

I heard he won player of the year for Taranaki, well thats what all the comentators have been saying. [/b]
No he didn&#39;t, that was Brock James.

Wally
26-03-06, 04:52 AM
And Brock James is ****.

Ripper
26-03-06, 05:34 AM
Still better then whatever bum the Reds have now that Flatleys retired.

Mr. Laxative
26-03-06, 06:24 AM
Um, Huxley. Yeah... brumbies should have kept him, along with Timmy Atkinson. If we did they woud be test players by now.

Wally
26-03-06, 11:40 AM
Huxley playing for the Wallabies.. have you been chroming?