A) Yup. Peel is still quality, but only in bursts. He dawdles at the ruck a lot, and his distribution is haywire - either on the floor or over the head. Could've just been a crappy season for him, but Willis was consistently quality. Great distribution, better box kicks and faster. Peel is still the master of quick taps, though. I'm not sure if you saw the game vs Bath where Peel went off injured after about 20 - Willis played out of his skin, and the whole team looked better whenever he came on from the bench (though that could just be because of fresh legs - though he looked for more "go forward" orientated that Peel, though Peel may have been told to keep is slow and steady, who knows).

True, however he'd still be the best tighthead in the squad regardless (apart from maybe Cobilas, if he's a bit rusty from not playing there). I think he will be used solely at Loosehead though (unless there's injury), he'll just be a straight up replacement for Sheridan.
C) True. Like I said, I'd happily go with either of McKenzie or Ostrikov as the "enforcer" in the squad. Ostrikov slightly ahead solely because he currently has the shirt due to McKenzie's injury. You're right about Gaskell as well, unfortunately. Consistently the first name on the team sheet despite only having a handful of decent performances last season. He's got a lot more competition for his spot(s) now, though, so hopefully we'll get someone on merit rather than reputation. Jones and Ward are fairly equal, I'd say. Ward is better in the tight (scrum and breakdown) but Jones is better ball in hand, and also has a higher workrate/gets to more rucks. I'd rather the better scrummager, due to that being a weakspot. Neither is particularly better than the other at lineouts, so like Ostrikov vs McKenzie it's either/or for me.
D) I meant next season, with Fridge being better.
E) I'm not sure what will happen next season. If it wasn't for the RWC I don't think we'd have come 6th, so it's hard to compare.