View Poll Results: SBW leaving NZRU, good or bad?

Voters
23. You may not vote on this poll
  • Bad, he was pure class

    13 56.52%
  • Good, his behaviour was bad for the union

    3 13.04%
  • Don't care, he's overrated anyway

    7 30.43%

Sonny Bill Williams confirmed to leave New Zealand

   
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
  1. #31
    Senior Member

    Shaggy's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 1,787 posts
    • Joined: Aug 2010
    • From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    New Zealand
    Quote Originally Posted by Rhyer View Post
    These players don't demand special attention or as much money as a 3 time IRB player of the year and captain of the national team or the highest points scorer in test rugby.
    Not quite sure where you are coming from there Rhyer ... SBW is none of what you've mentioned (unless that's your point) ... I'm merely pointing out that New Zealand players are "recruited" from overseas, and "lost" overseas all of the time, and there doesn't seem to be as much ill feeling towards these players as there is to SBW.

    Whether you spend a lump sum on SBW, or spend money on developing players from a young age, such as Ellison and Bateman, they are still a loss on investment for the NZRU if they choose to ply their trade outside of New Zealand. One of the complaints about SBW, is that he took away a space/playing position/opportunity for a domestic placed player ... and my point is, that while some are critical that SBW did so, they advocate that Bateman and Ellison should be the replacement for SBW in the All Blacks, when in reality, they have done exact same thing as SBW, by returning to play in New Zealand.
    ​Follow the TRF Official International Shield Holders -for more about our trophy

    http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/showthread.php?8033-The-Official-TRF-International-Shield


    SA - NZ - SA - Aus - NZ - France - NZ - SA - Aus - NZ - Aus - England - SA - Aus - NZ - SA - NZ - England Current Holders - Wales

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #32
    Senior Member

    • France
    • 444 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2011
    Montpellier
    Quote Originally Posted by Shaggy View Post
    Not quite sure where you are coming from there Rhyer ... SBW is none of what you've mentioned (unless that's your point) ... I'm merely pointing out that New Zealand players are "recruited" from overseas, and "lost" overseas all of the time, and there doesn't seem to be as much ill feeling towards these players as there is to SBW.

    Whether you spend a lump sum on SBW, or spend money on developing players from a young age, such as Ellison and Bateman, they are still a loss on investment for the NZRU if they choose to ply their trade outside of New Zealand. One of the complaints about SBW, is that he took away a space/playing position/opportunity for a domestic placed player ... and my point is, that while some are critical that SBW did so, they advocate that Bateman and Ellison should be the replacement for SBW in the All Blacks, when in reality, they have done exact same thing as SBW, by returning to play in New Zealand.
    My point is that he gets the same pay by the NZRU as Dan Carter (highest points scorer in rugby) and Richie McCaw (3 time IRB player of the year) at $750,000 per year while also demanding special attention such as allowing him to box, wait until after the World Cup to decide what franchise he would play for if he did resign for NZRU (leaving 4 days for the New Zealand teams to free money in the budget) and demand 1 year contracts.

  4. #33
    Senior Member

    FlukeArtist's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 506 posts
    • Joined: Jul 2010
    • From: West Auckland
    Blues
    Quote Originally Posted by Rhyer View Post
    My point is that he gets the same pay by the NZRU as Dan Carter (highest points scorer in rugby) and Richie McCaw (3 time IRB player of the year) at $750,000 per year while also demanding special attention such as allowing him to box, wait until after the World Cup to decide what franchise he would play for if he did resign for NZRU (leaving 4 days for the New Zealand teams to free money in the budget) and demand 1 year contracts.

    I don't knwo where you got that information from, but Steve Tew (NZRFU) stated in a radio interview I heard that Sonny Bill is not on anywhere near that sort of money with the NZRFU.

    Don't forget: A lot of SBW's income comes from 3rd party sponsorhips

  5. #34
    TRF Moderator

    • New Zealand
    • 4,427 posts
    • Joined: Apr 2009
    • From: Wellington, NZ
    Hurricanes
    Quote Originally Posted by Shaggy View Post
    SBW has been the form number 12 this year, and Nonu needed a kick up the @rse, as his form just hadn't been good enough.

    As for the long term replacement in the All Blacks, I'd go with Tamati Ellison (when he returns from injury) ... I'd start with Nonu and Smith, and use Ellison of the bench.

    Interesting that both Ellison and Bateman were both "lost" to New Zealand rugby prior to this season, but have returned like many before them, and welcomed with opened arms ... surely these players are also preventing the available positions to be filled by up and coming players who chose to stay in New Zealand
    I don't know how effective a long term replacement Tamati Ellison would be seeing as he's less than 11 months younger than Ma'a Nonu.

    I think the situations you mentioned are different entirely. Tim Bateman and Tamati Ellison are products of the New Zealand rugby system, all of whom would have returned on I'd imagine average salaries and have recieved no preferential treatment. Sonny Bill Williams was bought by New Zealand with a contract which other players couldn't demand. Ignoring money (I'm sure it wasn't a heck of a lot more than most senior players in Super Rugby at a starting rate, with further financial increases if/when he was promised to make the All Blacks, ontop of other media endorcements), it's the fact that he did recieve oppertunities that others didn't.

    In 2010 the All Blacks killed everyone, yet the only new cap on the end of year tour was Sonny Bill Williams off a handful of NPC games in which other players such as Robbie Fruean looked better. You can compare that to Tim Bateman and Tamati Ellison getting starting spots in Super Rugby if you like, but the reality is that they had already come through the New Zealand system and proved they were the best avalible and on performance they earned it. Bringing in a novice player to invest highly in him, rather than investing in proven NZ rugby products will always be different to me and I think the NZRU's treatment of SBW is pretty disgusting.

    That being said, like I've always said, good on him for him to take what he can get. Loyalty is something I respect in a player and it's something that I think SBW lacks, but I don't think he ever pretended to care about New Zealand rugby in the long run. Some of his BS about always wanting to be an All Black as a kid annoys me, as I think it's ingenuine when considering he's now leaving after not much more than a year of professional rugby in New Zealand and players like Hosea Gear who you know it means the world to miss out, but you have to credit him (and his agent and PR) for going and getting what ever he wants.

  6. #35
    Senior Member

    • France
    • 444 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2011
    Montpellier
    I wouldn't exactly call him a world cup winner either, although he is, he played 4 minutes in the final, come on in the 73rd minute in the semi and got a yellow 3 minutes later. He played the quarter against Argentina and a few pool matches but that isn't exactly heroic. I wouldn't compare it to Brad Thorn which is what people are saying he is trying to achieve (build a legacy of achievements).

    For a side note; Brad Thorn played every minute of the quarter final, semi final and final. Jerome Kaino played every minute of the RWC apart from the last 5 minutes in the final where he was pretty badly injured and took a lot of convincing to get off.
    Last edited by Rhyer; 10-07-12 at 12:03 PM.

  7. #36
    Lambie Lunatic!

    • Netherlands
    • 6,409 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2010
    • From: Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
    Sharks
    Added a poll. Thought that would be nice.

  8. #37
    Member

    • New Zealand
    • 71 posts
    • Joined: Oct 2011
    Hurricanes
    Pity you didn't add an option for:
    Don't care, he was overrated.

  9. #38
    Lambie Lunatic!

    • Netherlands
    • 6,409 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2010
    • From: Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
    Sharks
    What was that?

  10. #39
    Senior Member

    admartian's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 1,298 posts
    • Joined: Jul 2009
    • From: AKL
    New Zealand
    Quote Originally Posted by TRF_woosaah View Post
    sorry that you couldnt pick up on my sarcasm. or that i couldnt pick up on yours
    lol it was my bad.

    Sarcasm detector was off!

    Quote Originally Posted by ACT1NUP View Post
    Shame SBW will only ever be known as a good rugby player, a pretty good league player and an average boxer. Glad to see him go to league (eventually), the Kiwis need him more than the ABs do.
    It is a shame.

    Though that's what happens when all you do is chase the dollar. Not having a go at him for that; before his "harem" come in to defend the "Defenseless" Sonny Bill...

    Quote Originally Posted by welshglory View Post
    I find it strange though that he's gone to rugby lite. He probably would have got a similar deal in France with Toulon.

    Maybe he just enjoys league more, that's what the rumours have been anyway.
    I think he's going back to League based on a promise or handshake he's made with an un-named person.

    Which is rather ironic as he doesn't really have the best record of keeping to contracts and what not...








    Regarding a 12 other than Nonu, I'd like to see Kahui or Fruean given a go at that. Seeing as we haven't had an extra 'playmaker' (kicker, extra pivot and that) at that position since the Aaron Mauger and Luke McAlister days.
    [CENTER]

  11. #40
    Senior Member

    • 1,063 posts
    • Joined: Sep 2010
    Quote Originally Posted by Rhyer View Post
    I wouldn't exactly call him a world cup winner either, although he is, he played 4 minutes in the final, come on in the 73rd minute in the semi and got a yellow 3 minutes later. He played the quarter against Argentina and a few pool matches but that isn't exactly heroic. I wouldn't compare it to Brad Thorn which is what people are saying he is trying to achieve (build a legacy of achievements).

    For a side note; Brad Thorn played every minute of the quarter final, semi final and final. Jerome Kaino played every minute of the RWC apart from the last 5 minutes in the final where he was pretty badly injured and took a lot of convincing to get off.

    Right so any squad player that didn;t play the majority of the games for any team that has won the world cup can't really call themselves world cup winners. Great logic pal. Better ring up Dan Carter and tell him he isn't actually a world cup winner after all, he will be in for a major surprise.

  12. #41
    Senior Member

    admartian's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 1,298 posts
    • Joined: Jul 2009
    • From: AKL
    New Zealand
    Quote Originally Posted by donmcdazzle View Post
    Right so any squad player that didn;t play the majority of the games for any team that has won the world cup can't really call themselves world cup winners. Great logic pal. Better ring up Dan Carter and tell him he isn't actually a world cup winner after all, he will be in for a major surprise.
    I think what he's trying to say that he was more of a passenger. Yes, he's technically a world cup winner.

    Think of it more like some scrub that played with Michael Jordan or some bench warmer in any team to win any championship - read: not really influential in the process.

    Regarding Dan Carter, he was injured, and would have played in all the matches that he could have. SBW on the other hand, was fit, and was put on against lesser sides and/or to close out games.

    No one was saying that he didn't receive a medal.
    [CENTER]

  13. #42
    Senior Member

    • France
    • 444 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2011
    Montpellier
    I remember reading that Carter said he didn't feel like he won the RWC 2011 which is why it's his desire to win the 2015 one.

  14. #43
    Senior Member

    • France
    • 444 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2011
    Montpellier
    Quote Originally Posted by admartian View Post
    I think what he's trying to say that he was more of a passenger. Yes, he's technically a world cup winner.

    Think of it more like some scrub that played with Michael Jordan or some bench warmer in any team to win any championship - read: not really influential in the process.

    Regarding Dan Carter, he was injured, and would have played in all the matches that he could have. SBW on the other hand, was fit, and was put on against lesser sides and/or to close out games.

    No one was saying that he didn't receive a medal.
    Thank you. This is my point. Maybe I put things the wrong way.

  15. #44
    Senior Member

    Shaggy's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 1,787 posts
    • Joined: Aug 2010
    • From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    New Zealand
    Quote Originally Posted by TRF_nickdnz View Post
    I don't know how effective a long term replacement Tamati Ellison would be seeing as he's less than 11 months younger than Ma'a Nonu.

    I think the situations you mentioned are different entirely. Tim Bateman and Tamati Ellison are products of the New Zealand rugby system, all of whom would have returned on I'd imagine average salaries and have recieved no preferential treatment. Sonny Bill Williams was bought by New Zealand with a contract which other players couldn't demand. Ignoring money (I'm sure it wasn't a heck of a lot more than most senior players in Super Rugby at a starting rate, with further financial increases if/when he was promised to make the All Blacks, ontop of other media endorcements), it's the fact that he did recieve oppertunities that others didn't.

    In 2010 the All Blacks killed everyone, yet the only new cap on the end of year tour was Sonny Bill Williams off a handful of NPC games in which other players such as Robbie Fruean looked better. You can compare that to Tim Bateman and Tamati Ellison getting starting spots in Super Rugby if you like, but the reality is that they had already come through the New Zealand system and proved they were the best avalible and on performance they earned it. Bringing in a novice player to invest highly in him, rather than investing in proven NZ rugby products will always be different to me and I think the NZRU's treatment of SBW is pretty disgusting.

    That being said, like I've always said, good on him for him to take what he can get. Loyalty is something I respect in a player and it's something that I think SBW lacks, but I don't think he ever pretended to care about New Zealand rugby in the long run. Some of his BS about always wanting to be an All Black as a kid annoys me, as I think it's ingenuine when considering he's now leaving after not much more than a year of professional rugby in New Zealand and players like Hosea Gear who you know it means the world to miss out, but you have to credit him (and his agent and PR) for going and getting what ever he wants.
    Yeah, well at the risk of flogging a dead horse ... I still think the two situations are remarkably similar (even though the amount of money may be different) ... the fact that SBW has developed his skills in a rival code is irrelevant to me, in fact, as I've already mentioned, I think it's a bigger loss to NZ Rugby, when a player that the NZRU has put time (and money) into, over a number of years, takes up a contract overseas or with a rival club. After all, you could argue that those coaching and development resources could have been better used on another player that would stay in New Zealand.

    With respect Nick, the game is now professional, and just as we in the real world have to compete with others from within the organisations we work for, and with people from outside of the organisation, or positions. We also have the option to take our skills elsewhere for a better deal (as SBW, Bateman, Ellison, and numerous others have chosen to do from time to time).

    Loyalty, fairness, whether you like the player, and potential ability, don't have much to do with it in today's rugby world unfortunately.

    PS. Zeq I now you can't have too many options on your poll, but for what it's worth o he's not overrated (on current form, he's the best number 12 in NZ IMO), is it a good thing for the NZRU, well , it's a fact of life that they are going to lose a few players from time to time, (I don't think they were worried about his behavour) ... same with the bad option ... it's okay, because someone will make the most of the opportunity to fill the vacancy
    Last edited by Shaggy; 10-07-12 at 10:41 PM.
    ​Follow the TRF Official International Shield Holders -for more about our trophy

    http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/showthread.php?8033-The-Official-TRF-International-Shield


    SA - NZ - SA - Aus - NZ - France - NZ - SA - Aus - NZ - Aus - England - SA - Aus - NZ - SA - NZ - England Current Holders - Wales

  16. #45
    Member

    • New Zealand
    • 71 posts
    • Joined: Oct 2011
    Hurricanes
    Quote Originally Posted by Rhyer View Post
    I remember reading that Carter said he didn't feel like he won the RWC 2011 which is why it's his desire to win the 2015 one.
    I recall that as well which is nice but I am not sure he will be at the next world cup as our starting 10, he will be what 32-33?

    With the abundance of good young players vying for his position I think it will be hard for him to retain the position.

    Quote Originally Posted by Shaggy View Post
    PS. Zeq I now you can't have too many options on your poll, but for what it's worth o he's not overrated (on current form, he's the best number 12 in NZ IMO), is it a good thing for the NZRU, well , it's a fact of life that they are going to lose a few players from time to time, (I don't think they were worried about his behavour) ... same with the bad option ... it's okay, because someone will make the most of the opportunity to fill the vacancy
    Not so sure about that two thirds of those who have responded so far (5 out of 9) seem to prefer the option.

    Yeah he is overrated and overhyped and sadly over here, I think it is also debatable whether he is the form 12 in NZ at the moment.
    I will concede that he is probably in the top 5 number 12s in the country right now but given the amount of time and money spent on the team around him and the training he has been given at All Black level he is not head and shoulders above the other four.

    Personally I don't think he was a bad player but I really don't think he was the great player that all his sycophants made him out to be, in my opinion he remains the Paris Hilton of New Zealand rugby, famous for being famous and not for any outstanding talent.
    Last edited by Zapphod; 10-07-12 at 11:10 PM.

  17. #46
    Senior Member

    • 1,063 posts
    • Joined: Sep 2010
    Quote Originally Posted by admartian View Post
    I think what he's trying to say that he was more of a passenger. Yes, he's technically a world cup winner.

    Think of it more like some scrub that played with Michael Jordan or some bench warmer in any team to win any championship - read: not really influential in the process.

    Regarding Dan Carter, he was injured, and would have played in all the matches that he could have. SBW on the other hand, was fit, and was put on against lesser sides and/or to close out games.

    No one was saying that he didn't receive a medal.

    Maybe Carter was a bad example. Guildford then, didn't play in the big games but is still a world cup winning All Black.

    Nobody is going to argue that SBW wasn't necessary for the AB's to win the world cup, but you can't really take that away from him based on the fact he wasn't most influential player. It gets pretty murky when you start trying to qualify who are true winners based on their input and whether they were influential, whether that be Zac Guildford/SBW with the AB's or Bill Wennington with the Chicago Bulls with Jordan back in the day. Technically, figuratively, literally, whatever, they all won.

  18. #47
    Senior Member

    admartian's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 1,298 posts
    • Joined: Jul 2009
    • From: AKL
    New Zealand
    Quote Originally Posted by Rhyer View Post
    I remember reading that Carter said he didn't feel like he won the RWC 2011 which is why it's his desire to win the 2015 one.
    Yeah I remember seeing something about that after the RWC last year.

    Quote Originally Posted by donmcdazzle View Post
    Maybe Carter was a bad example. Guildford then, didn't play in the big games but is still a world cup winning All Black.

    Nobody is going to argue that SBW wasn't necessary for the AB's to win the world cup, but you can't really take that away from him based on the fact he wasn't most influential player. It gets pretty murky when you start trying to qualify who are true winners based on their input and whether they were influential, whether that be Zac Guildford/SBW with the AB's or Bill Wennington with the Chicago Bulls with Jordan back in the day. Technically, figuratively, literally, whatever, they all won.
    I think we're more or less on the same page. We understand that

    I'm not trying to say he didn't win it, but like Guildford, he probably won't be seen as a guy who's "Won it" - as say someone like Brad Thorn, Jerome Kaino, even Donald; or most other guys, did, and will likely be heralded (in pubs...with song...by bards/jesters...? I dunno).

    Guys like SBW and Guuldford etc can certainly tick it off the list, but as Rhyer said, even someone like DC will feel like he hasn't really done it yet and will be roaring for it in 2015.

    That's all it is.
    [CENTER]

  19. #48
    AKA Dingo_Darwin

    TRF_Darwin's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 4,200 posts
    • Joined: May 2007
    • From: Brisbane
    Highlanders
    Quote Originally Posted by Zapphod View Post
    I recall that as well which is nice but I am not sure he will be at the next world cup as our starting 10, he will be what 32-33?

    With the abundance of good young players vying for his position I think it will be hard for him to retain the position.



    Not so sure about that two thirds of those who have responded so far (5 out of 9) seem to prefer the option.

    Yeah he is overrated and overhyped and sadly over here, I think it is also debatable whether he is the form 12 in NZ at the moment.
    I will concede that he is probably in the top 5 number 12s in the country right now but given the amount of time and money spent on the team around him and the training he has been given at All Black level he is not head and shoulders above the other four.

    Personally I don't think he was a bad player but I really don't think he was the great player that all his sycophants made him out to be, in my opinion he remains the Paris Hilton of New Zealand rugby, famous for being famous and not for any outstanding talent.
    That is not even remotely debatable in my opinion - SBW has been head and shoulders above any other 12 in the country based on Super Rugby form. Indeed I'd say he has undoubtedly been the form 12 of the entire competition. If he was available for the Rugby Championship I would be 50/50 as to whether I would start him of Nonu at 12, as Nonu has starting to show some good form in recent weeks (and has been the best 12 in world rugby over the last 3-4 years IMO). While I certainly think people are more than justified in attacking SBW for his commitment (or lack there-of), there is no doubt he has evolved into a international quality rugby player over the last couple of seasons....

  20. #49
    Senior Member

    Sam Owen's Avatar
    • Samoa
    • 1,789 posts
    • Joined: Jul 2010
    • From: Samoa and Auckland NZ
    Blues
    Quote Originally Posted by TRF_Darwin View Post
    That is not even remotely debatable in my opinion - SBW has been head and shoulders above any other 12 in the country based on Super Rugby form. Indeed I'd say he has undoubtedly been the form 12 of the entire competition. If he was available for the Rugby Championship I would be 50/50 as to whether I would start him of Nonu at 12, as Nonu has starting to show some good form in recent weeks (and has been the best 12 in world rugby over the last 3-4 years IMO). While I certainly think people are more than justified in attacking SBW for his commitment (or lack there-of), there is no doubt he has evolved into a international quality rugby player over the last couple of seasons....
    Agreed 100%. Anyone that knows and can see 2012 Super Rugby (e.g. Dan Carter, Chiefs, All Blacks coaching staff, loads of Super players and etc) can tell you that Sonny is the in-form top 12 at the moment. When he was with the 'Saders last year, many were saying that it was his team and now he's with the Chiefs they're saying the same thing. Yes it is the team first and foremost, but lets give his 'Saders and Chiefs teamates a poll on how much he contributes on the field, not a poll on this thread where the SBW haters have been on stand by to fire away.

    Some people just dont like some players to the point it blinds them. You've got to see them for the way they play, the Rugby, even the ones you dont like.
    "WHAT?!!, run it straight then" - Sam Owen

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12