Southern Kings 2013

   
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
  1. #1
    Lambie Lunatic!

    • Netherlands
    • 6,409 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2010
    • From: Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
    Sharks

    Southern Kings 2013

    SARU confirms Vodacom Super Rugby participation for 2013
    The teams were confirmed after the General Meeting accepted a proposal first tabled by the Executive Council in January. The proposal was that: “The franchise occupying the lowest log position of the five franchises at the end of 2012 would be relegated.”

    http://www.supersport.com/rugby/supe...ation_for_2013

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    BANNED!!!

    • South Africa
    • 289 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2012
    Stormers
    Looking at the Lions financial state wonder if they would have taken the money rather. Kings had huge financial backing and even throwing huge sums of money at players no one wanted to go there. I wonder why. Who want to move to a franchise where you play 16 games Super Rugby and the rest in devision 1 of the Currie Cup. Like trying to sign A top footballer to play in the Coca Cola league

  4. #3
    Lambie Lunatic!

    • Netherlands
    • 6,409 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2010
    • From: Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
    Sharks
    Quote Originally Posted by Shovenose View Post
    Looking at the Lions financial state wonder if they would have taken the money rather. Kings had huge financial backing and even throwing huge sums of money at players no one wanted to go there. I wonder why. Who want to move to a franchise where you play 16 games Super Rugby and the rest in devision 1 of the Currie Cup. Like trying to sign A top footballer to play in the Coca Cola league
    1 or 2?

  5. #4
    'Ark at ee mun!

    TRF_SelimNiai's Avatar
    • Wales
    • 3,885 posts
    • Joined: Sep 2008
    • From: Bedminster, Bristol
    Bristol
    That is one serious allegation, someone might get sued if this proves false. Sorry, might? I meant will deffo get sued.
    "The story so far:
    In the beginning the Universe was created.
    This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move"


    2010's Most Underrated
    2012's Best Signature

  6. #5
    Lambie Lunatic!

    • Netherlands
    • 6,409 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2010
    • From: Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
    Sharks
    This whole Kings-saga has been going on for too long. Cheeky and his son Puke are the cancer within the South African rugby environment. Before this whole fiasco, that has been going on for years, the region was part of the Sharks franchise. What was wrong with that?

    The morons in PE should realize that the current format is settled for a period of 5 years (2 have passed so far). Once the current contracts finish, they will get their chance. How is it fair to kick the Lions out? If they have to make a distinction, just have a play-off game (home and away) between both teams. Or just have 1 match, hosted by the team who is currently out of the competition. I am sure every team will beat the Kings by a big margin. Hell, even the Griquas team would kick their asses.

  7. #6
    Junior Member

    • 12 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2012

    cheaper payoff?

    Why use an ugly word like "bribe"? Can't we just call it a "legal settlement"? It might sound like semantics, but the one is a crime and the other is quite above board. And I think it is the best solution. Just pay EP what it is due (on the basis of SARU having promised them something that is extremely difficult to deliver), and then they can wait until 2016.

    I have a feeling that in 2016, when the current TV contracts run out, there's going to have to be a major realignment anyway. I say this because of SANZAR's public musings about expanding into new markets that would enhance SupeRugby's financial situation. USA and Japan were mentioned, Argentina was also brought up. I think a Japanese team makes a lot of sense. Japan is the world's 3rd largest economy, so it's attractive from the $ end. They also have a professional Rugby league from which a SupeRugby side could be formed. The USA has the $, but no pro Rugby League, and Rugby would face stiff competition from other full-contact team sports such as Gridiron Football and (Ice) Hockey. The USA also has an unwritten rule that anything that the French are better at than the Americans can't really be a sport Argentina has the Rugby pedigree, especially after joining the Tri-Nations (which needs a new name by the way; anyone for "Quadrophenia"?), but doesn't bring much $ to the table.

    Anyway, getting back to the Kings topic, the article cited at the top of the thread indicated that if the Kings did not take the $ and wait until '16, the most likely scenario would be relegation of the Lions. But isn't SARU/SANZAR likely to get sued by the Lions sponsors, coaching staff, players, and anyone else that made a contract with the Lions on the understanding that they would continue to be a SupeRugby team?

    So I think in the end, the question boils down to who would be cheaper to settle with, Kings or Lions? (a possibility shovenose has already brought up)

    (And I think the idea of bringing back the Cats is a nonstarter, as that would just throw 3 franchises into turmoil instead of just 2)

    >

  8. #7
    Lambie Lunatic!

    • Netherlands
    • 6,409 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2010
    • From: Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
    Sharks
    Kings in Super Rugby... That's 10 easy points for the other teams. No match at Ellis Park for the Sharks. From a Sharks point of view, it is not that bad but the whole thing is a giant fiasco.

    What will happen to the Lions players? Sharks should try to snap up Cilliers and Jantjies.

  9. #8
    Senior Member

    stormer2010's Avatar
    • South Africa
    • 3,127 posts
    • Joined: Sep 2009
    • From: Durbanville, WP, South Africa.
    Western Province
    Well they can't fair much worse than the Lions. Hopefully WPRU sign Pat Cilliers and Jaco Taute ASAP!!

  10. #9
    Senior Member

    stormer2010's Avatar
    • South Africa
    • 3,127 posts
    • Joined: Sep 2009
    • From: Durbanville, WP, South Africa.
    Western Province
    Quote Originally Posted by TRF_Ezequiel View Post
    Kings in Super Rugby... That's 10 easy points for the other teams. No match at Ellis Park for the Sharks. From a Sharks point of view, it is not that bad but the whole thing is a giant fiasco.

    What will happen to the Lions players? Sharks should try to snap up Cilliers and Jantjies.
    Jantjies? What the hell are the Sharks going to do with Jantjies. At least at WP he could start. He isn't a superstar but maybe he could get our backline firing. Pat Cilliers is the biggest item on my wishlist. Goodbye Brok!! A quality utility back like Taute would also come in handy.

  11. #10
    Senior Member

    Gena_ZA's Avatar
    • South Africa
    • 1,115 posts
    • Joined: Jul 2010
    • From: Centurion, South Africa
    Stormers
    Remember to tune in in Feb of 2013 for the Chevy Chase edition of the SA conference

  12. #11
    Springbok Traditionalist

    heineken's Avatar
    • South Africa
    • 2,505 posts
    • Joined: Apr 2010
    • From: Polokwane, South Africa
    Blue Bulls
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    this is just typical SA Politics!!

    I feel bad for the Lions fans, as the final decision is a slap in the face. Not only do the Kings get the right to play in the 2013 Super Rugby Tournament, but for the Lions to get back into the tournament, they will have to play the bottom ranked SA side at the end of the tournament. Why didn't the same happen to the Lions. Let them play a promotion/relegation match vs the Kings.

    Oh well, wonder what will happen next??

    I just hope the Bulls sign Taute and send Kirchner back to Griquas or the Kings...

    At least the Blacks will shut up now... (insert sarcasm font)
    The Official 2012 TRF Best Newcomer

  13. #12
    Lambie Lunatic!

    • Netherlands
    • 6,409 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2010
    • From: Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
    Sharks
    Quote Originally Posted by stormer2010 View Post
    Jantjies? What the hell are the Sharks going to do with Jantjies. At least at WP he could start. He isn't a superstar but maybe he could get our backline firing. Pat Cilliers is the biggest item on my wishlist. Goodbye Brok!! A quality utility back like Taute would also come in handy.
    We don't have a back-up for Lambie. We need a fly-half to play for Natal in the Currie Cup. We don't need Taute since we have Ludik, Viljoen and Gouws to cover full-back. You guys can have Taute. I wonder if Strauss will move to Bloem.

  14. #13
    Springbok Traditionalist

    heineken's Avatar
    • South Africa
    • 2,505 posts
    • Joined: Apr 2010
    • From: Polokwane, South Africa
    Blue Bulls
    Quote Originally Posted by TRF_Ezequiel View Post
    We don't have a back-up for Lambie. We need a fly-half to play for Natal in the Currie Cup. We don't need Taute since we have Ludik, Viljoen and Gouws to cover full-back. You guys can have Taute. I wonder if Strauss will move to Bloem.
    Strauss will move to Cape Town if he can as that is where his Girlfriend lives...
    The Official 2012 TRF Best Newcomer

  15. #14
    Lambie Lunatic!

    • Netherlands
    • 6,409 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2010
    • From: Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
    Sharks
    WP can use some loose forward depth. Deon van Rensburg should buy some lottery tickets. Moving to PE months ago to play Super Rugby next year.

  16. #15
    Senior Member

    Sker's Avatar
    • South Africa
    • 943 posts
    • Joined: May 2010
    • From: Boland
    South Africa
    Shame. Would have liked Strauss at Boem. Failing that a time machine and Juan Smith from 2007.

  17. #16
    Lambie Lunatic!

    • Netherlands
    • 6,409 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2010
    • From: Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
    Sharks
    Prepare for some cricket scores next season! This was bound to happen eventually, but the way it happened is just wrong. I wonder how many Lions players will move to other franchises.

  18. #17
    Senior Member

    Icemn's Avatar
    • South Africa
    • 609 posts
    • Joined: Apr 2011
    • From: Cape Town, South Africa
    Hurricanes
    Quote Originally Posted by TRF_Ezequiel View Post
    Prepare for some cricket scores next season! This was bound to happen eventually, but the way it happened is just wrong. I wonder how many Lions players will move to other franchises.
    yip, but playing a soft team might make the other SA franchises a bit soft. Easy competition is not always a good thing. Then again, most of the 1st team players can rest, giving the younger guns a run. But then again its given points on offer...
    This can't be Naas Botha.........This man is running with the ball...

  19. #18
    Lambie Lunatic!

    • Netherlands
    • 6,409 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2010
    • From: Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
    Sharks
    Well, luckily they replace the weakest team and don't just join the 5 franchises. Otherwise there would be a lot of shit coming from NZ and OZ haha. No cock up at Ellis Park next year. That's nice.

    I just heard that Demetri Catrakilis is the first player moving to EP after the announcement of joining the Super Rugby competition.

    Southern Kings Boss Cheeky Watson has said that they will appeal the decision to include them for one year and press for a three year guarantee.

    What a moron. I guess he knows that they will end dead last in the competition and will lose a play-off match against the Lions.

  20. #19
    Senior Member

    • Wales
    • 2,220 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2008
    • From: Shangri'la, Cardiff
    Ospreys
    Quote Originally Posted by TRF_Ezequiel View Post
    Well, luckily they replace the weakest team and don't just join the 5 franchises. Otherwise there would be a lot of shit coming from NZ and OZ haha. No cock up at Ellis Park next year. That's nice.

    I just heard that Demetri Catrakilis is the first player moving to EP after the announcement of joining the Super Rugby competition.
    No, there would be a lot of shit going to NZ and OZ haha... In the form of the SA franchises, to lose rugby games
    Quote Originally Posted by Speedy
    : " cyRil, you are the gayest straight man in the world ".

    OSPREYS CALL TO ARMS: "As the Good Lord said, love thy neighbour as thyself. Unless he's a Turk, in which case KILL THE BASTARD!!!"


    Quote Originally Posted by Feic
    You guys we can handle, but an on form Welsh backline gives me the creeps

  21. #20
    Senior Member

    • Ireland
    • 980 posts
    • Joined: May 2010
    • From: Yorkshire
    Ulster
    seems like a harsh way of removing the lions

    im a bit light in my knowledge of springbok rugby
    but is it the classic old farts running it? just like the north

  22. #21
    Super Moderator

    TRF_Draggs's Avatar
    • Wales
    • 6,913 posts
    • Joined: May 2010
    Sharks
    Eze, has it slipped your mind that Ross Cronje plays for the Lions?
    I'll take Tian Meyer and Ruan Botha (provided we drop Sykes). Pat Cilliers would be a good call, but Province will probably hand him a blank cheque.
    In Shaun we trust

    @draggs_XV

  23. #22
    Lambie Lunatic!

    • Netherlands
    • 6,409 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2010
    • From: Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
    Sharks
    Ross Cronje wants to finish his study at UJ first, so he won't be coming back to Durban any time soon.

  24. #23
    Senior Member

    stormer2010's Avatar
    • South Africa
    • 3,127 posts
    • Joined: Sep 2009
    • From: Durbanville, WP, South Africa.
    Western Province
    Quote Originally Posted by Conal View Post
    seems like a harsh way of removing the lions

    im a bit light in my knowledge of springbok rugby
    but is it the classic old farts running it? just like the north
    The way I'd put it is it's a tug of war between the old farts and the new old farts with a political agenda.

    Quote Originally Posted by Draggs View Post
    Eze, has it slipped your mind that Ross Cronje plays for the Lions?
    I'll take Tian Meyer and Ruan Botha (provided we drop Sykes). Pat Cilliers would be a good call, but Province will probably hand him a blank cheque.
    WPRU SHOULD give Cilliers a blank cheque. Unfortunately what we should do and what we end up doing more often than not don't meet. Possibly because we are effectively owned by the Blue Bulls possibly because of our own stupidity but the end result is what it is.

  25. #24
    TRF Moderator

    • New Zealand
    • 4,426 posts
    • Joined: Apr 2009
    • From: Wellington, NZ
    Hurricanes
    Haha, remarkable.

    South African rugby is just a constant circus.

    SARU Agenda:
    1. Sign a five year plan with SANZAR to start a new Super Rugby format which includes 5 teams per conference.
    2. Promise Southern Kings a team in Super Rugby.
    3. Realize that 5+1= 6. One more than the agreement in stage one.
    4. Complain to SANZAR.
    5. Get rejected.
    6. Tell an Lions they have to leave the competition.
    Lions Agenda:
    1. Get themselves in financial difficulty
    2. Get told they're not going to be in Super Rugby
    3. Suspend head coach who won them CC
    4. Fire assistant coaches
    5. Lose players to other teams

    Credit to South Africa for being the second best team in the world, with the worst administration.

  26. #25
    Super Moderator

    TRF_Draggs's Avatar
    • Wales
    • 6,913 posts
    • Joined: May 2010
    Sharks
    Quote Originally Posted by stormer2010 View Post
    The way I'd put it is it's a tug of war between the old farts and the new old farts with a political agenda.



    WPRU SHOULD give Cilliers a blank cheque. Unfortunately what we should do and what we end up doing more often than not don't meet. Possibly because we are effectively owned by the Blue Bulls possibly because of our own stupidity but the end result is what it is.
    Anybody know who is off-contract with the GLRU this season? We can then divide the players up between WP, Blue Bulls, and Sharks.

    The Scarlets now think they are signing Jacobie Adriaanse, no clue of the source. I can't imagine Cilliers wanting to leave South Africa now, making the Springbok 22 recently.
    In Shaun we trust

    @draggs_XV

  27. #26
    Springbok Traditionalist

    heineken's Avatar
    • South Africa
    • 2,505 posts
    • Joined: Apr 2010
    • From: Polokwane, South Africa
    Blue Bulls
    Quote Originally Posted by Draggs View Post
    Anybody know who is off-contract with the GLRU this season? We can then divide the players up between WP, Blue Bulls, and Sharks.

    The Scarlets now think they are signing Jacobie Adriaanse, no clue of the source. I can't imagine Cilliers wanting to leave South Africa now, making the Springbok 22 recently.
    Aren't all the Lions players now out of contract seeing that they won't be playing Super Rugby next year? They can still be contracted as Golden Lions players and play Vodacom cup and Currie Cup, and then the other Franchises could contract them just for the Super Rugby, which I'm sure the big guns at the Lions would want instead of sticking around and play Vodacom Cup during the Super Rugby tournament...

    I wonder what would Elton Jantjies do seeing that his family lives in Pretoria and his brother is at the Bulls...

    Sent from my BlackBerry 9800 using Tapatalk
    The Official 2012 TRF Best Newcomer

  28. #27
    TRF Legend

    Feicarsinn's Avatar
    • Ireland
    • 5,881 posts
    • Joined: Jul 2007
    • From: Montreal
    Leinster
    I've always wondered, what exactly have Southern Kings done to earn themselves a franchise? Surely one could be offered to a more legitimate team, like the Pumas for example.


  29. #28
    Lambie Lunatic!

    • Netherlands
    • 6,409 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2010
    • From: Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
    Sharks
    The issue with that is that the smaller unions are already represented (on paper) in a different franchise.

    Griffons and Griquas are part of the Cheetahs franchise
    Valke is part of the Bulls franchise
    Leopards and Pumas are part of the Lions franchise
    Boland is part of the Stormers franchise

    That leaves Border, SWD and EP Kings to form the Southern Kings franchise.

    The Sharks franchise is the only one made up of just 1 union.

    With that in mind, the 3 unions not yet represented got picked in stead of making a whole new franchise and breaking up the Cheetahs franchise for instance (If Griquas was formed as a franchise)

  30. #29
    Super Moderator

    TRF_Draggs's Avatar
    • Wales
    • 6,913 posts
    • Joined: May 2010
    Sharks
    Quote Originally Posted by heineken View Post
    Aren't all the Lions players now out of contract seeing that they won't be playing Super Rugby next year? They can still be contracted as Golden Lions players and play Vodacom cup and Currie Cup, and then the other Franchises could contract them just for the Super Rugby, which I'm sure the big guns at the Lions would want instead of sticking around and play Vodacom Cup during the Super Rugby tournament...

    I wonder what would Elton Jantjies do seeing that his family lives in Pretoria and his brother is at the Bulls...

    Sent from my BlackBerry 9800 using Tapatalk
    Haven't you already got Steyn on your books? Cronjé, Fouché, Pollard as well.
    I think WP should look at signing him, as he can kick goals but might actually inspire something. On second though, go to the Bulls, Elton!

    @Feic, bitched at SARU; Cheeky Bastard Watson has called his friends. I expect Luke Watson to be named the the glorious leader of the Kings for life.
    In Shaun we trust

    @draggs_XV

  31. #30
    Senior Member

    Shaggy's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 1,787 posts
    • Joined: Aug 2010
    • From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    New Zealand
    WOW ... I just realised that former Crusaders Hooker, Matt Sexton, is the coach of the Kings ... back in the day, he used to vie for the starting position at the Saders with the now Hurricanes coach, Mark Hammett ... perhaps they can now renew their rivalry as the least popular Super Rugby coaches
    ​Follow the TRF Official International Shield Holders -for more about our trophy

    http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/showthread.php?8033-The-Official-TRF-International-Shield


    SA - NZ - SA - Aus - NZ - France - NZ - SA - Aus - NZ - Aus - England - SA - Aus - NZ - SA - NZ - England Current Holders - Wales

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast