Super Rugby play-offs: Chiefs - Crusaders in Hamilton (28/07/2012)

   
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
  1. #1
    Lambie Lunatic!

    • Netherlands
    • 6,409 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2010
    • From: Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
    Sharks

    Super Rugby play-offs: Chiefs - Crusaders in Hamilton (28/07/2012)


    Waikato Stadium, Hamilton


    Referee: Craig Joubert
    Referee: Jonathan Kaplan
    Referee: Keith Brown
    Referee: Garratt Williamson

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Senior Member

    • France
    • 444 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2011
    Montpellier
    It kind of annoys me that it has come to this. I would have preferred Chiefs vs Stormers and Sharks vs Crusaders or something along those lines. These are fixtures we have seen twice this season already. Where as the Stormers and Chiefs haven't even played each other yet it looks like they won't be able to because I see Crusaders stomping the Chiefs like last time.

  4. #3
    Lambie Lunatic!

    • Netherlands
    • 6,409 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2010
    • From: Delft, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
    Sharks
    This season:

    Stormers 15-12 Sharks in round 2
    Crusaders 19-24 Chiefs in round 3
    Sharks 25-20 Stormers in round 14
    Chiefs 21-28 Crusaders in round 17


    Other head-to-head matches of the 4 remaining teams:

    Crusaders 31-24 Stormers in round 8
    Sharks 12-18 Chiefs in round 9

    Stormers and Chiefs didn't meet each other this year, neither did the Crusaders and Sharks

  5. #4
    Waikato Junglist

    Amobokoboko's Avatar
    • Belgium
    • 3,512 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2008
    • From: Leuven South, Belgium
    Chiefs
    Hope the Chiefs found their momentum back.
    Apple is the hair of my motor

    Yeah, pimped and ready to roll






  6. #5
    Senior Member

    Shaggy's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 1,787 posts
    • Joined: Aug 2010
    • From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    New Zealand
    Yeah, I agree with Rymer, that it's a shame that the Sharks v Crusaders and Stormers v Chiefs, but I guess at least this way we are guaranteed a NZ v SA final. I guess I've got to go with my Crusaders in this one, but wouldn't be that upset if the result went the other way, as the Chiefs have played a pretty goodbrand of Rugby this year, and deserve to be there ... I just feel that the Crusaders may have a better chance of beating the Stormers at home, if it comes to that
    ​Follow the TRF Official International Shield Holders -for more about our trophy

    http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/showthread.php?8033-The-Official-TRF-International-Shield


    SA - NZ - SA - Aus - NZ - France - NZ - SA - Aus - NZ - Aus - England - SA - Aus - NZ - SA - NZ - England Current Holders - Wales

  7. #6
    Senior Member

    Dizzy's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 1,361 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2007
    • From: Hawkes Bay, New Zealand
    Hurricanes
    Quote Originally Posted by Rhyer View Post
    It kind of annoys me that it has come to this. I would have preferred Chiefs vs Stormers and Sharks vs Crusaders or something along those lines. These are fixtures we have seen twice this season already. Where as the Stormers and Chiefs haven't even played each other yet it looks like they won't be able to because I see Crusaders stomping the Chiefs like last time.

    The teams themselves are the only ones to blame.. They knew what they had to do to achieve this possibility and they couldn't...

  8. #7
    Senior Member

    • New Zealand
    • 1,773 posts
    • Joined: Aug 2010
    Read is out
    http://i120.photobucket.com/albums/o.../kakahitsm.jpg
    "The laughing bear, drives a motorcycle" - Israel Dagg, Sep - 2011
    Cometh the hour, cometh the Don!

  9. #8
    AKA Dingo_Darwin

    TRF_Darwin's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 4,200 posts
    • Joined: May 2007
    • From: Brisbane
    Highlanders
    Quote Originally Posted by Larksea View Post
    Read is out
    A big blow for the Crusaders again - hopefully he will be back for the final if the Crusaders make it that far. I can't imagine there will be many changes in the Crusaders team - they may well pick the same 22 that ran out against the Bulls. It is possible that Ben Franks may be included in the starting lineup in place of Crockett, but personally I'd stick with Crockett starting. The only other change that the may consider is the inclusion of Maitland in the starting lineup - either as a straight swap for Adam Whitelock, or for Fruean, with Whitelock moving to centre. Though it would seem a bit strange dropping Fruean, I think it is a genuine possibility. Fruean has been very quiet over the later half of the season, and while he was solid enough on defense against the Bulls, he wasn't really tested much (and will surely be more severely tested by the Chiefs).

    The strange thing about the Chiefs is that despite having such an impressive season it is really hard to identify what their top XV is. This is probably due to the fact they have so many players performing this season, meaning competition for spots is very intense. I'd expect Tameifuna to start at 3, but there are tight calls at LH prop and hooker. I'd go for Schwalger and Smith, but we could well see Elliot and/or Taumalolo starting. I think the bench prop is going to be important - if Ben Afeaki is fit I'd have him on the bench. The Chiefs scrum was under huge pressure from the Hurricanes scrum when Tameifuna went off against them (meaning Smith moved to TH prop) - if the scrum got hammered by the Canes imagine what the Crusaders scrum will do to them! Though Afeaki isn't as much of an impact player as either Smith or Taumalolo, I don't think the Chiefs can afford to have a weak scrum against the Crusaders. If the starting LH prop has to go off one of Afeaki or Tameifuna would have to pack on the LH side - while neither has that much experience there, I'd be more confident with one of those two at LH rather than Smith at TH....

    The locks and 2/3 loose-forwards pick themselves, with the only selection issue being who will start at 7. Though Latimer has had a very good year (and Cane is good at making an impact from the bench) I'd be inclined to start Cane at 7, as I think they will really need the extra physicality that he brings against a Crusaders side that was incredibly physical against the Bulls. 9, 10 and 12 pick themselves, and I'd stick with Willison at 13, though there is the possibility of picking Horrell there. There are plenty of options in the outside backs - personally I'd go 11. Nanai-Williams, 14. Masaga, 15. Horrell, but Tikoirotuma and/or Robinson may be given the nod.

    Can't wait for this match, should be a cracker!
    Last edited by TRF_Darwin; 22-07-12 at 08:59 PM.

  10. #9
    Senior Member

    • New Zealand
    • 1,773 posts
    • Joined: Aug 2010
    kinda gutted, was hoping this would be the final.

    Going to be really interesting to see what chiefs team is named.

    Elliot or Mo at hooker? Mo is such a powerful guy but lately I'm been seeing him give away some silly penalties (which for me gives the #1 spot to Hika, so close between them) and I hope for Hika's All Black chances he gets a start. All Black coaches will only have he Flynn and McDonald to look at in the finals series as far as hookers go.

    Cane or Latimer to start? I think they need to keep going with Lat's he's tried and true this season. Bring Cane on if whoever is selected at #8 is not performing (messam to 8), I don't think Kane Thomson has been at his best the last couple of games.

    Toby Smith or Sona? in my view Toby Smith has to start the extra power in the scrum is vital against the crusaders. Also going to be interesting to see if Afeaki is involved, he should be back from injury (head knock). Tameafuna I think is sure to start at 3. I think overall he got the best of the franks brothers last time they played, he really is a pretty special player, I don't think even Owen franks impressed as much as he has at this young age.

    13 - 15 is anyone's guess. Pretty unsettled area, Horrell is sure to start but will it be 13 or 15? he's performed very well in both positions/any position this year and Defended Fruen very well in the last crusaders encounter. But he's also maybe the best option at 15. Wings in particular are anyones guess. i think Masanga for right wing and a coin toss on the other side between Nanai and Tiko but Robinson may be in the mix as well. If I were coach I'd look at how they are training and see if I could see who wanted it more.

    I predict a big game from SBW, he's had a massive workload this year but he's had a couple of weeks rest and he will want to leave NZ on a high note - these next 1-2 games will be his last as a chief and he will want to make the most of it and bury the daemons of mucking up the try that was missed in the last game.

    Such a shame Kahui is out, I know he would shine in this game. He has an ability to lift when he wants to, just pushes a button and picks his momments. He doesn't do it every week, keeps it in reserve. Chiefs will miss this stuff:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGNZssC_eCs

    Chiefs will look at the last game and ignoring the shocker TMO call which cost them the game the slow start was the main shortcoming they can control. they need to have shaken off the bye cobwebs from the opening whistle.

    Good news is the three really bad TMO calls which were made in the lead up to the playoffs the officials who made them will have been suspended from taking part in these playoffs. Last thing the chiefs need is a bad call costing them three games in a row.
    Last edited by Larksea; 22-07-12 at 11:14 PM.
    http://i120.photobucket.com/albums/o.../kakahitsm.jpg
    "The laughing bear, drives a motorcycle" - Israel Dagg, Sep - 2011
    Cometh the hour, cometh the Don!

  11. #10
    Senior Member

    Invictus's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 1,688 posts
    • Joined: May 2007
    Waikato
    I'm hoping for:
    1 Smith
    2 Elliot
    3 Taumeifuna
    4 Clarke
    5 Retalick
    6 Latimer
    7 Cane
    8 Messam
    9 Kerr-Barlow
    10 Cruden
    11 Nanai-Williams
    12 SBW
    13 Willison
    14 Masaga
    15 Horrell

    And a bench of Schwalger, Afeaki, Fitzgerald, Thompson/Bradley, Leonard, Horrell, Tikoirotuma


  12. #11
    AKA Dingo_Darwin

    TRF_Darwin's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 4,200 posts
    • Joined: May 2007
    • From: Brisbane
    Highlanders
    Quote Originally Posted by Invictus View Post
    I'm hoping for:
    1 Smith
    2 Elliot
    3 Taumeifuna
    4 Clarke
    5 Retalick
    6 Latimer
    7 Cane
    8 Messam

    9 Kerr-Barlow
    10 Cruden
    11 Nanai-Williams
    12 SBW
    13 Willison
    14 Masaga
    15 Horrell

    And a bench of Schwalger, Afeaki, Fitzgerald, Thompson/Bradley, Leonard, Horrell, Tikoirotuma
    Throughout most of the season I would have agreed with you that would be the Chiefs best loose-trio, but as the season has progressed I'm not sure anymore. I have no doubt that these are the best three loose-forwards, or even that they would be the best loose-forward combination, but I'm not sure that they would be the best loose-forward combination for the Chiefs game plan. The Chiefs game plan has revolved a lot around their play in the tight - though they have a good tight-five I wouldn't have said that they were an outstanding combination, yet they have matched it with almost every pack they have faced this season. I think one of the major reasons for this is that they have effectively been playing 6 tight-forwards - though Thomson is playing 8, he is far more comfortable as a lock (and still plays like a lock). Though I think the Chiefs would be more effective in the loose with a Latimer, Cane, Messam trio, I just wonder whether they would be as good in tight, which has been a highlight of their play this season.

  13. #12
    Senior Member

    Invictus's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 1,688 posts
    • Joined: May 2007
    Waikato
    Yeah it's a toughie. Remember that the Crusaders loosies are all 7s at heart, so I figured it would be better to try counter that.


  14. #13
    Waikato Junglist

    Amobokoboko's Avatar
    • Belgium
    • 3,512 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2008
    • From: Leuven South, Belgium
    Chiefs
    Sorry for hijacking the topic. But it seems Kane Thompson is leaving the Chiefs. Where is he going to?
    Apple is the hair of my motor

    Yeah, pimped and ready to roll






  15. #14
    Senior Member

    Invictus's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 1,688 posts
    • Joined: May 2007
    Waikato
    You notice it on Facebook too? :P Yeah I hadn't heard anything till now...


  16. #15
    Senior Member

    dudeabides's Avatar
    • United States
    • 263 posts
    • Joined: May 2010
    • From: Pensacola, FL
    United States
    The Chiefs being the underdogs in this one despite playing at home, and given all they've accomplished this year in that tough as hell conference of theirs has got to make them a little more fired up than they would be already.

  17. #16
    Junior Member

    • 24 posts
    • Joined: Feb 2007
    The Cheifs have played some nice rugby this season, but lost there last two outings. The Crusaders have had a couple of slip ups, but have been quietly going about their business and I have a feeling they might just squeeze this one.

  18. #17
    Junior Member

    • New Zealand
    • 20 posts
    • Joined: Jun 2011
    Crusaders
    I see the Saders are favourites with the TAB for this one despite finishing behind the Chiefs in the regular season and playing away from home.

    Must admit to being a little worried as a Sader supporter, Chiefs have been playing some beautiful rugby and can really put teams away if given half a chance.
    I do wonder about the Chiefs lack of experience in these type of games compared to the likes of the Saders. Young guys like TKB will be under immense pressure and it will be interesting to see how he handles it.

    Read is a loss but McCaw has really stepped up and looks like the 2nd best 8 in the world right now. And I think M Todd has been one of the Saders best over the last couple of weeks. The battle of the backrow will be huge, interested to see what combination the Chiefs put out for this one, I would have thought Lats would be better off running on with Cane coming off the bench.

    Crusaders to take it by 8

  19. #18
    TRF Moderator

    • New Zealand
    • 4,427 posts
    • Joined: Apr 2009
    • From: Wellington, NZ
    Hurricanes
    Quote Originally Posted by saderista View Post
    I see the Saders are favourites with the TAB for this one despite finishing behind the Chiefs in the regular season and playing away from home.

    Must admit to being a little worried as a Sader supporter, Chiefs have been playing some beautiful rugby and can really put teams away if given half a chance.
    I do wonder about the Chiefs lack of experience in these type of games compared to the likes of the Saders. Young guys like TKB will be under immense pressure and it will be interesting to see how he handles it.

    Read is a loss but McCaw has really stepped up and looks like the 2nd best 8 in the world right now. And I think M Todd has been one of the Saders best over the last couple of weeks. The battle of the backrow will be huge, interested to see what combination the Chiefs put out for this one, I would have thought Lats would be better off running on with Cane coming off the bench.

    Crusaders to take it by 8
    Wouldn't go that far! He's played well, but #8 is still arguably his worst position in the loose forwards.

  20. #19
    AKA Dingo_Darwin

    TRF_Darwin's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 4,200 posts
    • Joined: May 2007
    • From: Brisbane
    Highlanders
    Crusaders team named:

    Wyatt Crockett, Corey Flynn, Ben Franks, Luke Romano, Samuel Whitelock, George Whitelock, Matt Todd, Richie McCaw (c), Andy Ellis, Dan Carter (vc), Zac Guildford, Ryan Crotty, Robbie Fruean, Adam Whitelock, Israel Dagg.
    Reserves: Quentin MacDonald, Owen Franks, Tom Donnelly, Luke Whitelock, Willi Heinz, Tom Taylor, Sean Maitland.

    One change from last week, with Ben Franks replacing his brother Owen. Can't say I agree with the change. While I can understand the Crusaders rotating there top three props throughout the season, in a knock-out game you need to start your best 15, and there is no doubt that Owen Franks is a better TH prop than his brother!

    The Chiefs side is set to be named this afternoon.

  21. #20
    Senior Member

    • New Zealand
    • 1,773 posts
    • Joined: Aug 2010
    I don't think the chiefs deserve to be clear underdogs on form. their last two losses were arguably only because of two bad TMO decisions. Luckly those TMO's wont be taking part in the finals because of those calls.

    only reason I have the Chiefs as underdogs is because of the Crusaders experience and history when it comes to playoff games.

    I think the chiefs will win if they start well, they gave the crusaders a poor starting 10-15 min last time really hurt them but they showed they had the ability to come back and make up the deficit they had and were even the better team for much of the rest of the game.

    Renee needs to use his bench too, bring Leonard on with 20min to go not 5min to go even 10min is not much time. few scrums and a kick at goal and the best part of 10min is gone.
    http://i120.photobucket.com/albums/o.../kakahitsm.jpg
    "The laughing bear, drives a motorcycle" - Israel Dagg, Sep - 2011
    Cometh the hour, cometh the Don!

  22. #21
    Senior Member

    Invictus's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 1,688 posts
    • Joined: May 2007
    Waikato
    1. Sona Taumalolo
    2. Mahonri Schwalger
    3. Ben Tameifuna
    4. Craig Clarke (c)
    5. Brodie Retallick
    6. Liam Messam
    7. Tanerau Latimer
    8. Kane Thompson
    9. Tawera Kerr-Barlow
    10. Aaron Cruden
    11. Asaeli Tikoirotuma
    12. Sonny Bill Williams
    13. Andrew Horrell
    14. Tim Nanai-Williams
    15. Robbie Robinson
    16. Hika Elliot
    17. Ben Afeaki
    18. Michael Fitzgerald
    19. Sam Cane
    20. Brendon Leonard
    21. Jackson Willison
    22. Lelia Masaga

    Interesting...


  23. #22
    AKA Dingo_Darwin

    TRF_Darwin's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 4,200 posts
    • Joined: May 2007
    • From: Brisbane
    Highlanders
    I couple of very interesting selections for the Chiefs. I would have preferred Smith over Taumalolo, but Taumalolo certainly won't let the team down! Good to see Ben Afeaki back on the bench though. I'm not surprised to see Latimer starting again at 7, but I do feel they would be better of with Cane's physicality against the Crusaders. I'm sure Horrell will do a good job at centre (he did last time against the Crusaders), but I still prefer him at fullback. Slightly surprised to see Masaga relegated to the bench again, and I'm still not 100% convinced with Robinson at fullback - he has made some big improvements in his game this season, but he can still struggle defensively at times. I wouldn't be surprised if the Crusaders target him with a few high balls too....

  24. #23
    Member

    Ruckyou's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 56 posts
    • Joined: Jul 2012
    • From: Auckland
    Auckland
    im guttered cheifs havent given Declan Odonnell any playing time this year. waste of talent.

  25. #24
    Senior Member

    Invictus's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 1,688 posts
    • Joined: May 2007
    Waikato
    Yeah, but when you have three other super wingers in your squad it's understandable that he won't get a lot of game time...


  26. #25
    AKA Dingo_Darwin

    TRF_Darwin's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 4,200 posts
    • Joined: May 2007
    • From: Brisbane
    Highlanders
    Plenty of great match-ups in this match!

    I think the Crusaders have an edge in the front-row, even if they do have one of the best TH props in the world sitting on the bench. Ben Franks vs Taumalolo will be very interesting - Franks really needs a strong match if he wants to be included in the next AB's squad. On the other side Tameifuna vs Crockett is another great match-up - Crockett can often struggle against shorter props. I think the Crusaders have an slight edge in the locks too. Clarke is very consistent at this level (and was really missed the last time the teams met), but Romano looks more like an All Black every week. Sam Whitelock and Retallick are the two best lock in New Zealand, so there match-up will particularly interesting. I think Retallick has had a slightly better season overall, but Whitelock probably had his best game of the year last weekend.

    The Crusaders look to have a slight edge in the loose forwards too. Messam has an obvious edge over George Whitelock (who is still under-rated by many), but I'd take Todd over Latimer (just), and McCaw is in a different class to Thomson (even at number 8). The Chiefs do have Sam Cane on the bench, and I'd expect he will make a big impact when he comes on.

    The halves battle is very interesting - again I see the Crusaders with a very slight edge. Ellis always seems to perform well at this level, but Kerr-Barlow has been very impressive this season. I'd still just prefer Ellis though - Kerr-Barlow is a great ball runner, a very strong defender (much better than Ellis), but his decision making is still a bit erratic at times. Cruden has been a lot quieter in recent weeks (perhaps due to his achilles injury?), but has had an outstanding season, so his match-up vs Carter will be great to watch! I think the Chiefs have an advantage in the mid-field. Though I've got a lot of time for Crotty, SBW has been outstanding this season (the best 12 in the competition in my opinion). Fruean has been a bit quiet overall this season - it will be interesting if Horrell is able to contain him as he did last time the teams met. Again I think the Crusaders have a slight edge out wide - I still think picking Robinson at fullback will prove a mistake for the Chiefs.

    Overall I'm expecting it to be a very close match. I'm picking the Crusaders to win (by 5-10 points) as I think they have the edge in a number of areas, and perhaps more importantly a lot more 'big match experience'. Can't wait for this match!

  27. #26
    Senior Member

    Invictus's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 1,688 posts
    • Joined: May 2007
    Waikato
    I'd pick the Crusaders too... But I'm hoping to be pleasantly surprised!!


  28. #27
    Senior Member

    Icemn's Avatar
    • South Africa
    • 609 posts
    • Joined: Apr 2011
    • From: Cape Town, South Africa
    Hurricanes
    i don't know who to go for here :? i rather want the sharks to beat the stormers so we can have a final in NZ...

    regardless of who wins between the chiefs or saders...
    This can't be Naas Botha.........This man is running with the ball...

  29. #28
    Senior Member

    Invictus's Avatar
    • New Zealand
    • 1,688 posts
    • Joined: May 2007
    Waikato
    As much as I'd like to see the Chiefs/Crusaders have a home final, I think the Stormers need to be there to make it that much more epic.


  30. #29
    Senior Member

    Icemn's Avatar
    • South Africa
    • 609 posts
    • Joined: Apr 2011
    • From: Cape Town, South Africa
    Hurricanes
    Quote Originally Posted by Invictus View Post
    As much as I'd like to see the Chiefs/Crusaders have a home final, I think the Stormers need to be there to make it that much more epic.
    i personally don't feel the stormers deserve to be there nor being on top of the overall log...

    they are there cuz of their defence aka the bus...

    i'm old school... The best defense is a good offense lol
    This can't be Naas Botha.........This man is running with the ball...

  31. #30
    Senior Member

    • Wales
    • 3,705 posts
    • Joined: Mar 2011
    • From: London
    Georgia
    Quote Originally Posted by Icemn View Post
    i personally don't feel the stormers deserve to be there nor being on top of the overall log...
    This is Rugby Union not Gymnastics.

    The winner isn't decided by off field judges on their aesthetic look and their artistry.

    It's decided on the scoreboard and the team with most points wins.

    Go and watch Sevens if you hate good defence so much.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast