I've already said I think he got it it wrong, just saying that that's not a new thing that they look atYeah but passive is if you stand there and go backwards. Davies was going forward, just Montoya was stronger. Barnes got it wrong.
I've already said I think he got it it wrong, just saying that that's not a new thing that they look atYeah but passive is if you stand there and go backwards. Davies was going forward, just Montoya was stronger. Barnes got it wrong.
The mitigation there was that JGP was the second Leinster tackler and there waa enough of a dip to drop it. I also thought that should have been red at the time.Interesting if I recall correct Gibson Park got a yellow in a champions cup game for very similar, it’s certainly not unique here.
Based on precedent Barnes and Pearce would have talked themselves down to a rugby incident, scrum to restart.Thinking about the discussion has anyone actually said it was a clear yellow and not a red? Aren't we all just discussing precedent and why Barnes was wrong?
Probably but then Sarries should probably have had a pen for either potter or Raffiel being miles offside and Cole’s slowing the ball down before the turn over leading to tigers clearing their lines, feel like if it was anyone but Sarries there forums would be mentioning Tigers infringements more.Itoje should get a yellow for that (trying to drag the mail down).
I hate both teams. Sarries just more obvious with their cheating.Probably but then Sarries should probably have had a pen for either potter or Raffiel being miles offside and Cole’s slowing the ball down before the turn over leading to tigers clearing their lines, feel like if it was anyone but Sarries there forums would be mentioning Tigers infringements more.
I’m not a fan of either but what cheating are Sarries guilty of that Tigers are not? Majority of decisions are not going Sarries way.I hate both teams. Sarries just more obvious with their cheating.