• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

A Political Thread pt. 2

Not the number itself, the reason for bombing them is because they're not just hospitals.

International law recognises using hospitals, schools and places of worship for military purposes (or as human shields) as a war crime which is why you are allowed to bomb those places if they are being used as such. And it is very, very odd and further proof (not that I need any personally) of what Hamas whole strategy is in this whole thing. Commit a genocidal act and then conduct a war as one big war crime and get the international world to focus on Israeli war crimes.
Shame there isn't independent media there to confirm that they are not just hospitals
 
Shame there isn't independent media there to confirm that they are not just hospitals
I mean, Sinwar was killed in a tunnel right underneath a hospital. What more proof do you need? And the fact they had 36. 36!

I agree journalists should've been granted more access from the start, though. But baring in mind the type of enemy they are fighting, and more importantly the strategy they are using, I can understand the rationale behind not, though I disagree.
 


He wasn't. Last drone footage b4 he was killed proves he wasn't in a tunnel underneath a building. Whether it was a hospital?




 


This map shows the hospital surrounded by 3 schools as well. Good positioning. The military YouTube guy who said there were 36 hospitals said this is what Taiwan should do (not that China would give a **** and you also lose any credibility you have but it's a good tactic)
 
He's pretty legitimate to be fair. Does talks and presentations to NATO summits and stuff
Yeah, I’ve only seen a handful or so of his videos before (mainly on Ukraine) so I’m not 100% sure on him but he seems ok. Obviously has a heavy western/military bias but he seems fair (though I would say that as I agree with him)
 
Yeah, I've only seen a handful or so of his videos before (mainly on Ukraine) so I'm not 100% sure on him but he seems ok. Obviously has a heavy western/military bias but he seems fair (though I would say that as I agree with him)

That guy is hilarious! Sat there smoking a cigarette with a whiskey just casually discussing highly complex military tactics hahaha

Theres another guy, forget his name, very factual and straight down the line, less eccentric

Edit: Kagan Dunlap
 
Last edited:
That guy is hilarious! Sat there smoking a cigarette with a whiskey just casually discussing highly complex military tactics hahaha

Theres another guy, forget his name, very factual and straight down the line, less eccentric

Edit: Kagan Dunlap
He definitely knows his **** (and I feel slightly more confident that @McTallshort seems to think he’s legit)

However, I’ve seen flat earthers seem like they know their **** so you still have to be careful.
 
He definitely knows his **** (and I feel slightly more confident that @McTallshort seems to think he's legit)

However, I've seen flat earthers seem like they know their **** so you still have to be careful.

Don't get me wrong, I see both those guys as entertainment, if I was invested in anything they claimed id go check it out.

Kagan actually made a video about the Bomber that bombed Irans unusual activity thenday before on take off lol
 
Don't get me wrong, I see both those guys as entertainment, if I was invested in anything they claimed id go check it out.

Kagan actually made a video about the Bomber that bombed Irans unusual activity thenday before on take off lol
I don’t really see it as entertainment but I haven’t seen loads of his videos. He’s charismatic and sure you’ve got be entertaining to a certain degree otherwise people won’t consume your content I suppose but the few times I’ve watched his videos is to be informed by something. You’re 100% right though, should check info but that goes for anyone really.
 

Latest posts

Sponsored
UnlistMe
Back
Top