• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

England vs New Zealand - 15/11/2025

Am i hearing correctly that England have been fined £2000 for their V challenge to the haka..as it breaks Haka challenge protocols.

What that actual F.....??!
I thought the only rule was not going over the halfway line?
Not sure if we did, but realistically if we did then oh well - dumb rule but it is what it is
 
I thought the only rule was not going over the halfway line?
Not sure if we did, but realistically if we did then oh well - dumb rule but it is what it is
We did, but it doesn't look like our v got within 10m.

Always a dumb rule, and quite honestly, for a £2k fine, just keep breaking it.
When the law is an arse, it's almost a duty to break and expose it
 
Not sure i agree. Dont recall the time on the clock but i do remember the play: NZ kicks long, behind Smith's back. 2 all blacks chase. He doesnt really sprint (giving the chasers time to close the distance), gets the ball, and instead of kicking it out (he still had time to do so) he goes in between two all blacks while all of the english players were still running back. He gets pinned, doesnt release, penalty for NZ.
Game was still up for grabs at that point.

I see that as a 'clearing out' problem. Smith got beyond the two tacklers, with players behind him, who could have protected the ball. At worst a miscommunication.

Everyone brands Smith as a bit of an X factor player, yet his team-mates are surprised when he tries something a little X factor. You'd not see France or Fiji unprepared like that.
 
Delighted with yesterday’s result. What is really promising is that we won even when things weren’t going well- eg the lineout first half, kicking game to begin with etc, but that we came back really strongly.

There’s usually been the need to be almost perfect to beat the ABs so to make some errors and still power through is really good news. A great win and whilst I wouldn’t disagree if someone said NZ weren’t quite at their best yesterday, we saw enough of how ruthless they are in the 22 and how they can effortlessly move the ball around and history tells you any win is a great win over them.

Thought the scoreboard management 2 mins before HT to take the 6 points on offer with DGs was exactly what was needed and set the platform for our second half.

Chasing NZ a converted score down is not an enviable task so that just helped settle us I thought and I hope is the sort of calm leadership we see going forward.

To have Baxter, Heyes, Coles, Pepper suddenly looking like they could possibly make a mark in the pack is really supplementing the established names and gives us that depth.

Promising signs and hope England continue to evolve ahead of a spicy 6N!
 
Locks
The gap between Itoje, Chessum and Martin and Coles + Ewels is scary massive for me. We really need someone to step up and fill bridge that gap. It's like going from 3 world class options to 2 players that prob wouldn't get into any of the top 10 squads.
Come on now … Coles and Ewels are not as good as Itoje, Chessum & Martin but to suggest they ‘probably wouldn’t get into any of the top 10 squads’ is a wild over statement.

For one, I’d argue that Itoje and Chessum are excellent and everyone else (including Martin IMO) suffer in comparison.

SA and France have mad depth but the after Beirne, McCarthy, Ryan and Henderson, Ireland’s cupboard is pretty bare. The Kiwi locks are largely inexperienced and not anything special. Apart from Skelton, I wouldn’t be in a rush to swap any of the Aussie locks for Coles or Ewels. Same goes for the Scots, Argentinians, Fijians, Italians.

IMO, they easily make a good chunk of those squads and possibly start in a few.
 
I really want us to get more minutes into CCS because I do think we're missing a tight carrier in the pack - obviously it didn't matter in the end but I did notice that yesterday there were a few times we'd send a backrower on a short hard carry (to move a ruck infield or whatever) and they'd get blasted backwards and we'd have to scramble to secure

Yeah I really don't trust Borthwick to have a back up plan
Come on now … Coles and Ewels are not as good as Itoje, Chessum & Martin but to suggest they 'probably wouldn't get into any of the top 10 squads' is a wild over statement.

For one, I'd argue that Itoje and Chessum are excellent and everyone else (including Martin IMO) suffer in comparison.

SA and France have mad depth but the after Beirne, McCarthy, Ryan and Henderson, Ireland's cupboard is pretty bare. The Kiwi locks are largely inexperienced and not anything special. Apart from Skelton, I wouldn't be in a rush to swap any of the Aussie locks for Coles or Ewels. Same goes for the Scots, Argentinians, Fijians, Italians.

IMO, they easily make a good chunk of those squads and possibly start in a few.
Martin fit was ahead of Chessum for most people

I stand by my comments though
Hard disagree with NZ
Aus have about 5 locks that are above them imo
You named 4 locks for Ireland who are well ahead of those 2
Scotland have so many better locks than those 2
Italy I would say they would be 3rd and 4th choices there
Fiji Coles would get in Ewels wouldn't imo purely down to style
 

Don't know about you guys but I was definitely stunned
Standard Wales online. England achieve something Wales have only been able to dream of and their coverage of it consists of talking about Pollock licking his lips, Marcus Smith's hot girlfriend and the fact England got in trouble for dwarf throwing in 2011...
 
see that as a 'clearing out' problem. Smith got beyond the two tacklers, with players behind him, who could have protected the ball. At worst a miscommunication.
Two things. First, i dont think he went beyond those two tacklers. Second, the clearing out problem, if you want to call it that way, arises from the decision Smith takes, which puts his team mates in an arguably unfavorable (50-50 at best) position. The all blacks come from their side while the English have to go back past the ball and come back again to join the ruck. They lose both time and momentum.
The FB manual (patent pending) says you should kick (or, if you are incredibly fast, run towards the middle and kick out the ball to the other side).

I'm all in favour of x factor thingies, but there's a time and a place for it. That wasnt it.
 
Standard Wales online. England achieve something Wales have only been able to dream of and their coverage of it consists of talking about Pollock licking his lips, Marcus Smith's hot girlfriend and the fact England got in trouble for dwarf throwing in 2011...

"Marcus Smith loses hot girlfriend to even hotter Henry Pollock during dwarf throwing wager"

WOL setting standards in journalism since 1953.
 
Yeah I really don't trust Borthwick to have a back up plan

Martin fit was ahead of Chessum for most people

I stand by my comments though
Hard disagree with NZ
Aus have about 5 locks that are above them imo
You named 4 locks for Ireland who are well ahead of those 2
Scotland have so many better locks than those 2
Italy I would say they would be 3rd and 4th choices there
Fiji Coles would get in Ewels wouldn't imo purely down to style
Most people? Not sure about that. I think the general consensus with Martin is that he flatters to deceive. A bigger reputation than his actual performances deserve.

Who are Scotland's 'so many better locks' and the Italians that relegate them to 3rd/4th choice?

Anyway - you said they probably wouldn't make top 10 squads and then mostly contradicted yourself.

I can't decide whether you're overrating other players or seriously underrating Ewels and Coles.
 
When did we last see George Martin at full fitness and form, playing to his best for England?

Been a long time if I recall.
I think this is the nail on the head he has been the enforcer England have missed but only in a couple of games when fit, he has also had some average performances which is understandable post injury, if he can get to his best and put a good run of games together I think you can make a valid argument he makes most teams but that’s a relatively big if at this point. Outside of SA I can’t really think of many that don’t have a fairly significant drop off after first choice, I don’t think it’s too much of an area of concern with Itoje getting the lion share of game time as long as I can remember it’s hard for other players to be discovered and blooded. If you need solid get the job done without anything highlights real worthy in the absence of the current regulars NI could do a job, impossible to say but I think Englands lineout yesterday could have been better with him and no I am not advocating him to replace anyone currently there just saying there are options if injury happens.
 
When did we last see George Martin at full fitness and form, playing to his best for England?

Been a long time if I recall.

That’s the thing.

But when he is on song, he makes a difference.

Itoje’s going to be picked for the foreseeable, but I actually think Chessum is our premier lock now. He’s obviously bulked up and while I used to think Borthwick’s Plan A for him was 6, I no longer believe that.

Coles isn’t at those levels but I thought he acquitted himself decently yesterday.

As for the Boks they’re still relying a lot on Etzebeth (34), Mostert (34) de Jager (32) and Snyman (30). Some talent, but aging. Nortje has come through but I’m not sure about the real depth behind the old lags. Besides, in terms of the next RWC, I’m actually more bothered about what they’re doing behind the scrum.
 
Two things. First, i dont think he went beyond those two tacklers. Second, the clearing out problem, if you want to call it that way, arises from the decision Smith takes, which puts his team mates in an arguably unfavorable (50-50 at best) position. The all blacks come from their side while the English have to go back past the ball and come back again to join the ruck. They lose both time and momentum.
The FB manual (patent pending) says you should kick (or, if you are incredibly fast, run towards the middle and kick out the ball to the other side).

I'm all in favour of x factor thingies, but there's a time and a place for it. That wasnt it.

We'll agree to disagree.

I'm quite happy to be in a minority of one, but I'm not in this case, which suggests that it's not really a basis for criticising Smith's overall performance. He had a long time in a position which isn't his and looked quietly competent, even if you count that as an error.
 
When did we last see George Martin at full fitness and form, playing to his best for England?

Been a long time if I recall.

I would say he was pretty good in last years six nations v Ireland and France

And let's be real v SA in that Semi final that was only 2 years ago so in what world is that a long time?

If memory serves me he was massive v Ireland in that same year six nations
 
We'll agree to disagree.

I'm quite happy to be in a minority of one, but I'm not in this case, which suggests that it's not really a basis for criticising Smith's overall performance. He had a long time in a position which isn't his and looked quietly competent, even if you count that as an error.
IMHO it’s just lazy speculation without watching, others can make mistakes constantly and face very little criticism, if your not an out and out 15 every little detail is under a microscope where as if your are everything’s justified in one way or another for example I criticised Steward not looking too hot in the air in the last couple of weeks was dismissed as not having blockers anymore when this is allegedly his USP, you would also forgive smith for some errors as it’s the biggest stage and he lacks experience, I am with you he was quietly competent there, I’ve seen actual FBs make far more errors. He hasn’t ever been as bad as has been made out, considering his size was fairly heroic in parts of the wc acting as a sufficient speed bump against vastly bigger stronger players, he wouldn’t be my first choice but sometimes circumstances dictate these things and I think he gave a very good account of himself yesterday.
 

Latest posts

Sponsored
UnlistMe
Back
Top