Search results for query: *

You can also check out our website www.drafteugby.com and our blog with lots of fantasy gold at www.fantasyxvdraft.com (which will be added to rugbydraft.com soon). If you have any questions feel free to hit us up on our Facebook or twitter

Hey guys Im actually one of the blokes at Draft Rugby, formally known as Fantays XV Draft. Our platform this year will feature a very similar scoring system to foxsports. Weve kept in mind their scoring system as we think it was the best out, however weve tweeked a few things to reward some...

If schalk pleaded it must be correct...

Calling shift in the back row Calling number of changes for wallabies Horwill n Simmons 2nd row Poey hooper and McCalman backrow Genia gits 10 or 12 and either foley or toomua. Kurindrani Tomane AAC and Folau

You could play poey or hooper at 6, and replace Skelton with horwill or another jumper

He did offer lots, just not in the same areas. Pocock didn't get a turnover but he made at least one forced penalty and the ball came out the back of the ruck a lot quicker when he and horwill came on Hooper played too good to leave out for me though. Make room for both

Mate hooper was good.. But he did nothing in the rucks and maul

Haha well that was the initial point I was trying to get at and clearly failing. SomeOke was saying they had the same amount of linebreaks

Yea as I said, I'd say 900 is a stretch. But I don't think 8 or 9 line breaks is a stretch and that they got a number of more line breaks than the Boks, which is where this all started. SomeOke was stating that for most of the game the wallabies attack was Ineffective. If we spent more time with...

Haha, did you see stats for the super rugby grand final? Highlanders ran 711m with 57% of the ball How bout Brumbies and hurricane semi? Canes made 651m with 59% of the ball and 61% territory. Each half the field is 50m mate. Run that 18 times and never run it in your own half and you can...

I get that is probably a stretch for metres but the boks apparently got 380-400 and hardly had the ball so it isn't that unrealistic to think the wallabies had a fair bit more

They also had the ball for almost twice as long as well, making over double the passes

They also opted to run it a lot more while the boks opted to kick

How can't you believe that? They had close to double the ball and that is less than double the metres

Mate, every set of stats so far are completely different..

Mate it was a close game The wallabies started strong the first 20 and the last 20 The middle of the game was the Boks, with the two tries coming within 10 mins game play. The wallabies played a good brand of rugby, kicked away less ball, yet they made more mistakes in attack. The Boks defence...

There is only 2 line breaks difference between the two stars for the wallabies haha. I feel like we definitely had more line breaks but can't be 100% sure

Less than double the ball with triple the clean breaks

Not sure where you are getting your stats, we had 3 times the line breaks

Wallabies showed hope It was their first hit out