J
jimmy44
Guest
I recon rugby challenge will still be for the casual gamers, and rugby 2006 for those looks for a simulation of the sport. I recon EA are going to surprise everyone and rugby 2006 will be a winner.
EA rugby games have been consistently "unfinished products" with each addition released... Rugby 2005 looked pretty but had more gameplay and setup issues than worth mentioning, and I personally don't see how the game could be that much better with less than a years work on it... Other than that, WCR had far better ground work for a great rugby game than witnessed in Rugby 2005, and it's passing and kicking systems were far superior... As such, in my opinion Rugby 2006 cannot possibly be as good as RC2006 because the gameplay systems put in place by swordfish are already vastly superior to anything HB has been able to muster. Also, I have contention with the claim that EA rugby games are more "simulation", as for that to be true the game would need a rucking system with some deapth and control to it and more realistic options with forwards. Rugby 2005 was a game trying to be a simulation, but overall was basically very shallow in my opinion. So while Rugby 2006 will undoubtedly have more options, licenses and game modes (but will probably still sport a lines tour with no hosting option), RC2006 will have the superior gameplay by far!Originally posted by jimmy44@Nov 16 2005, 04:52 AM
I recon rugby challenge will still be for the casual gamers, and rugby 2006 for those looks for a simulation of the sport. I recon EA are going to surprise everyone and rugby 2006 will be a winner.
Even though you have no idea what Rugby 2006 will be like.Originally posted by Jamie Lyon@Nov 16 2005, 09:48 AM
Trust me, RC06 will own Rugby 2006.
No online play sorry. Also, they worked on making 2005 for over 18 months, so of course it would be tonnes better than 2004(in fact it would have been near impossible for them not to make a game that was tonnes better than 2004)... This time however, HB have spent around 6 months working on a sequel... And untill I see evidence to the contrary I will continue to be convinced of how badly it will suck. Also wally, the stadiums and licenses won't mean **** if the gameplay of RC2006 shits all over Rugby 2006 will it?Originally posted by Wally+Nov 16 2005, 11:16 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Wally @ Nov 16 2005, 11:16 AM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-Jamie LyonEven though you have no idea what Rugby 2006 will be like.@Nov 16 2005, 09:48 AM
Trust me, RC06 will own Rugby 2006.
Rugby 2006. Reason: More licenses, tournaments, players, stadiums, presumably better graphics, online play and if the jump from 2004 to 2005 was anything to go by, 2006 should be another drastic step up. [/b]
What makes you think Rugby 2006 will have more deapth? Rugby 2005 was a game trying to look deep, but too afraid to leave the shallow end of the pool... Rugby 2005 needs ALOT of work, and I just don't think 6 months is long enough.Well we really know know about r2k6 so it's basically stupid to compare them in the first place. They will both do me in different ways (and not just sexually). One will be there to have fun with, but I doubt if its depth will match up to that of r2k6's. Seeing how rugby is my favourite sport, depth is important.[/b]
I know online isn't in because according to my mate at Harvey Norman they are gonna wait till next gen so they don't have to create 2 different online systems... Also, the game will likely be out by feburary, so it will be 8-10 month game max, and probably still have a Lions tour where you can't play as the hosts.Originally posted by Wally@Nov 16 2005, 04:24 PM
Well to correct you, by the time it comes out it would have been in development for atleast 12 months. That's enough time. Ofcourse Rugby 2k6 will have more depth, there'll just be more to work with - from a southern hemisphere perspective anyway. It will get boring very quickly playing career mode with a northern hemisphere team, with northern hemisphere players.
Anyway, how do you know it's not online? One could only assume it is and I don't remember it being announced otherwise.
There is never enough time for a lazy, EA funded development company. They haven't made one good game. Ever. Not one!Originally posted by Wally@Nov 16 2005, 05:24 PM
Well to correct you, by the time it comes out it would have been in development for atleast 12 months. That's enough time. Ofcourse Rugby 2k6 will have more depth, there'll just be more to work with - from a southern hemisphere perspective anyway. It will get boring very quickly playing career mode with a northern hemisphere team, with northern hemisphere players.
Anyway, how do you know it's not online? One could only assume it is and I don't remember it being announced otherwise.
Why do you say 'IF' RC 2006 is going to be released. Of course it will be released its just a matter of when surely?Originally posted by TheBokke@Nov 16 2005, 10:52 PM
Hey guys I think we are getting a bit a head of ourselves here we have not even got a release date as of yet for RC 2006 never mind Rugby 2006. My main concern with all these delays is not which is better but more like lets hope it is released!!!
At least Rugby League 2 now has a release date to look forward to and they know it is going to hit the shelves for sure unlike us poor suffering Union fans.
Really hope "IF" RC 2006 is released it will live up to expectations!