Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
2014 QBE Internationals [EOYT] England
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Peat" data-source="post: 674470" data-attributes="member: 42330"><p>Eh? Since when has he been looking to select Fraser and Kvesic? Have I misunderstood something here?</p><p></p><p>I don't see how playing Robshaw at 7 tied him to no big blindsides either. Or big locks, something else he's mostly ignored. Lancaster has just been consistently indifferent to playing big guys. Has Garvey even been in one of his squads? Like, even a Saxons one? He's blithely ignored Atwood and Slater for the Launchbury/Lawes/Parling triumvirate of workhorse, preferred Tom Johnson over Haskell most of the time.</p><p></p><p>Not being funny, but I don't get how you get Lancaster moving to a big guy or playing Slater ahead of Parling as a logical argument based on Lancaster's actions, unless he's said something I've missed. I'd quite like him to consider these ideas too, don't get me wrong, but it seems a little reach-y...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Peat, post: 674470, member: 42330"] Eh? Since when has he been looking to select Fraser and Kvesic? Have I misunderstood something here? I don't see how playing Robshaw at 7 tied him to no big blindsides either. Or big locks, something else he's mostly ignored. Lancaster has just been consistently indifferent to playing big guys. Has Garvey even been in one of his squads? Like, even a Saxons one? He's blithely ignored Atwood and Slater for the Launchbury/Lawes/Parling triumvirate of workhorse, preferred Tom Johnson over Haskell most of the time. Not being funny, but I don't get how you get Lancaster moving to a big guy or playing Slater ahead of Parling as a logical argument based on Lancaster's actions, unless he's said something I've missed. I'd quite like him to consider these ideas too, don't get me wrong, but it seems a little reach-y... [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
2014 QBE Internationals [EOYT] England
Top