Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Featured
2024 Guinness Six Nations
[2023 Six Nations] Ireland v England - 18 March 2023
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ragey Erasmus" data-source="post: 1125464" data-attributes="member: 56232"><p><img src="https://scontent-man2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/337098424_599978615361463_4782909577102439338_n.jpg?stp=cp6_dst-jpg&_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=dbeb18&_nc_ohc=mZ-dKHe8hQ4AX-BVJUc&_nc_ht=scontent-man2-1.xx&oh=00_AfDS3M9f8_rH8U8WjyMS4gtMTavKBm27cXRBa38R8XlYnw&oe=641CBF86" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="width: 264px" /></p><p>So let's see: In Steward's case you have the sudden change in height of the "tackled" player as a mitigation along with the fact it was an involuntary collision. Ignored. In Underhill's case you have late change in dynamics due to another player (the player he was tackling got rolled over Tuilagi's back rather than falling to the floor as Underhill intended). Both mitigations ignored. 2 Irish collisions to the head with the shoulder, with force and no mitigation, well let's play on eh?</p><p></p><p>Considering Ireland only really pulled away after the red card, England can have a right to feel aggrieved. The 2 sides were not reffed to the same standard at all. Ireland should have had at least 2 cards, at least 1 a red and potentially both but instead get nothing. England have 2 cases with mitigation and the mitigation was ignored both times. That's just ******* farcical.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ragey Erasmus, post: 1125464, member: 56232"] [IMG width="264px"]https://scontent-man2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/337098424_599978615361463_4782909577102439338_n.jpg?stp=cp6_dst-jpg&_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=dbeb18&_nc_ohc=mZ-dKHe8hQ4AX-BVJUc&_nc_ht=scontent-man2-1.xx&oh=00_AfDS3M9f8_rH8U8WjyMS4gtMTavKBm27cXRBa38R8XlYnw&oe=641CBF86[/IMG] So let's see: In Steward's case you have the sudden change in height of the "tackled" player as a mitigation along with the fact it was an involuntary collision. Ignored. In Underhill's case you have late change in dynamics due to another player (the player he was tackling got rolled over Tuilagi's back rather than falling to the floor as Underhill intended). Both mitigations ignored. 2 Irish collisions to the head with the shoulder, with force and no mitigation, well let's play on eh? Considering Ireland only really pulled away after the red card, England can have a right to feel aggrieved. The 2 sides were not reffed to the same standard at all. Ireland should have had at least 2 cards, at least 1 a red and potentially both but instead get nothing. England have 2 cases with mitigation and the mitigation was ignored both times. That's just ******* farcical. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Featured
2024 Guinness Six Nations
[2023 Six Nations] Ireland v England - 18 March 2023
Top