Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
A new tournament: "the 4N"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fcukernaut" data-source="post: 144223"><p>I've always thought fairly highly of the Puma's but now certainly I believe they should be included in the Tri-Nations. I don't care about the geographical problems, they need to be in the tournament. Argentina won't gain a thing from playing USA, Canada and Uraguay. And like wise USA and Canada won't gain as much from playing Argentina as they will from playing a selection of sides in the Churchill cup. That's not a slag on Argentina, because clearly they would be the best side in the Churchill Cup, but because they play a variety of 'A' sides and the NZ Moari. This exposes the two NA sides to multiple styles of rugby and different types of players. Should Argentina wish to put an 'A' side into the tournament than so be it. I do believe than Argentina 'A' is currently in a different tournament already. </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I looked it up Argentina 'A' is in the Nations Cup which also has Romania, Georgia, "Emerging Boks" and Italy 'A'.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fcukernaut, post: 144223"] I've always thought fairly highly of the Puma's but now certainly I believe they should be included in the Tri-Nations. I don't care about the geographical problems, they need to be in the tournament. Argentina won't gain a thing from playing USA, Canada and Uraguay. And like wise USA and Canada won't gain as much from playing Argentina as they will from playing a selection of sides in the Churchill cup. That's not a slag on Argentina, because clearly they would be the best side in the Churchill Cup, but because they play a variety of 'A' sides and the NZ Moari. This exposes the two NA sides to multiple styles of rugby and different types of players. Should Argentina wish to put an 'A' side into the tournament than so be it. I do believe than Argentina 'A' is currently in a different tournament already. I looked it up Argentina 'A' is in the Nations Cup which also has Romania, Georgia, "Emerging Boks" and Italy 'A'. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
A new tournament: "the 4N"
Top