Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
All Black EOYT North named .....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kaftka" data-source="post: 283523"><p>Ahem.... Only two Hookers? And Flynn as well? Very strange.</p><p></p><p>Stoked for Guildford but where the hell is Gear? How does Ben Smith jump above him on the pecking order? I always knew the selectors had something against Gear...</p><p></p><p>I don't mind the call of Delany that much.. It just seems a little strange that they'd pick the 3rd 1st 5 at all when there is McAlister in the midst... Sorta seems like a waste of a selection, but like I say... they could have made stranger calls...</p><p></p><p>Like Ben f***ing Smith!! I would take Gear, Dagg, Paterson, Slade, Mum over Benny Smithy Smithson</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kaftka, post: 283523"] Ahem.... Only two Hookers? And Flynn as well? Very strange. Stoked for Guildford but where the hell is Gear? How does Ben Smith jump above him on the pecking order? I always knew the selectors had something against Gear... I don't mind the call of Delany that much.. It just seems a little strange that they'd pick the 3rd 1st 5 at all when there is McAlister in the midst... Sorta seems like a waste of a selection, but like I say... they could have made stranger calls... Like Ben f***ing Smith!! I would take Gear, Dagg, Paterson, Slade, Mum over Benny Smithy Smithson [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
All Black EOYT North named .....
Top