S
snoopy snoopy dog dog
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (feicarsinn @ Jan 21 2009, 11:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Nidhogg @ Jan 21 2009, 10:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Again, unless it was trialled, I couldn't really argue against this however I will say that if a team chooses to kick to touch from a penalty yet kicks it dead by mistake, it's a scrum/22 option to the defence under the existing laws. The missed penalty = scrum/22 merely extends the existing law.its a interesting though but in many ways its giving the advantage back to the team thats just committed an offence if the kick is miss which is a tad bit daft[/b]
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Nidhogg @ Jan 21 2009, 10:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
I wouldn't go as far as to say it forces teams to kick to touch although it would make it a bit more frequent. I think it would lead to more positive rugby with teams attacking the corner more often (bring back the maul!!!) and would also demand teams have a smart leader on the field who can decide when to go for the 3 points on offer and when to go for the jugular. At the moment it's pretty easy for a captain to decide which option to take. Empowering captains more can only be a good thing and makes the sport more spontaneous and unpredictable.The idea is that teams won't actually kick unless they a. have a very good kicker b. are in good range. It's meant to force teams to kick to touch, BECAUSE otherwise the defending team who committed the offence get's the ball again.[/b]