Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
Site News & Suggestions
An Tarbh
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sambãd5" data-source="post: 76279"><p>seriously guys, we have a six month syndrome. every six months, we have a big tantrum, someone leaves and then were fine again.</p><p></p><p>st h, charlie, teh mite, a +rep is coming your way for handling the situation.</p><p></p><p>all i can say is that, currently imo, the rep system doesnt work. lets face it. only a few nights ago we had charlie begging for reps. we also have multiple reps for the same reason (eg, kaftkas handling of los lover) which isnt exactly a bad reason to get a rep, but to get what was it in the end? 32548976289356 rep points for it is just silly. </p><p></p><p>also you can currently +rep someone for either generraly good posting, because they are valuable to the forum, or because they are a good bloke. yet you cant -rep someone because of general bad posting, because they are worthless to the forum or because they are a dick. imo - we need to get stricter on +reps and more leinent on -ves. or even better, why not just have +reps. make it harder to get one.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>then again, sometimes you just have to put up with moderating mistakes etc.</p><p></p><p>but you can still **** of the moderation team and get off scott free. trust me! :blink:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sambãd5, post: 76279"] seriously guys, we have a six month syndrome. every six months, we have a big tantrum, someone leaves and then were fine again. st h, charlie, teh mite, a +rep is coming your way for handling the situation. all i can say is that, currently imo, the rep system doesnt work. lets face it. only a few nights ago we had charlie begging for reps. we also have multiple reps for the same reason (eg, kaftkas handling of los lover) which isnt exactly a bad reason to get a rep, but to get what was it in the end? 32548976289356 rep points for it is just silly. also you can currently +rep someone for either generraly good posting, because they are valuable to the forum, or because they are a good bloke. yet you cant -rep someone because of general bad posting, because they are worthless to the forum or because they are a dick. imo - we need to get stricter on +reps and more leinent on -ves. or even better, why not just have +reps. make it harder to get one. then again, sometimes you just have to put up with moderating mistakes etc. but you can still **** of the moderation team and get off scott free. trust me! :blink: [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Site News & Suggestions
An Tarbh
Top