Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Argentinian Rugby
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TRF_heineken" data-source="post: 965345" data-attributes="member: 40658"><p>[QUOTE = "Horacito, post: 965105, member: 71745"] Let's see, I don't get so angry. First: it was obvious that it would be like that. Second: I don't think it's serious. Nothing was thrown four years, we just played the final of the SR and won the cup that South African for 90 points. The idea of the English that we are a third-party team makes sense: they scored 40 points.</p><p></p><p>The issue of pumas is serious and has little to do with specific errors: the team has been destroying four years. Point. That is something that Ledesma evidently failed to manage and that has cost the team a world cup. Then blur and cuena new, the question is if they take Ledesma to put Quesada. That seems to me a mistake. I would give Ledesma at least one more year to take charge of the situation and see what he does.</p><p></p><p>Regards! [/ QUOTE]</p><p></p><p>I don't think it's much to brag about that you won the Currie Cup first division championship. </p><p></p><p>But it is definitely a big accomplishment that the Jags got to the SR final.</p><p></p><p>But here is my question to all of you Argentine members. Do you now see what we meant when we said your players aren't resting enough during SR? The rotation policy which SA, Aus and NZ are using is working. Plus we meant it when we said that the SR isn't such an important thing during a WC year.</p><p></p><p>It's not that we wanted to discredit the Jags performance, it's that we know the WC is more important, and that we've gone through this cycle before. Whereas this was your first time being involved in a WC and a SR tournament.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TRF_heineken, post: 965345, member: 40658"] [QUOTE = "Horacito, post: 965105, member: 71745"] Let's see, I don't get so angry. First: it was obvious that it would be like that. Second: I don't think it's serious. Nothing was thrown four years, we just played the final of the SR and won the cup that South African for 90 points. The idea of the English that we are a third-party team makes sense: they scored 40 points. The issue of pumas is serious and has little to do with specific errors: the team has been destroying four years. Point. That is something that Ledesma evidently failed to manage and that has cost the team a world cup. Then blur and cuena new, the question is if they take Ledesma to put Quesada. That seems to me a mistake. I would give Ledesma at least one more year to take charge of the situation and see what he does. Regards! [/ QUOTE] I don't think it's much to brag about that you won the Currie Cup first division championship. But it is definitely a big accomplishment that the Jags got to the SR final. But here is my question to all of you Argentine members. Do you now see what we meant when we said your players aren't resting enough during SR? The rotation policy which SA, Aus and NZ are using is working. Plus we meant it when we said that the SR isn't such an important thing during a WC year. It's not that we wanted to discredit the Jags performance, it's that we know the WC is more important, and that we've gone through this cycle before. Whereas this was your first time being involved in a WC and a SR tournament. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Argentinian Rugby
Top