Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Argentinian Rugby
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cruz_del_Sur" data-source="post: 966056" data-attributes="member: 55747"><p>You are giving us your perspective from your side of the pond without an iota of evidence to support your view. </p><p>Not quite the same. </p><p></p><p></p><p>That implies we are not trying to fix it. 3rd time: we are. </p><p>We just have a very different diagnosis of what the problem is. </p><p>And we are open to suggestions, but the evidence you've provided is poor at best. The correlation you mentioned is not short of saying that because i have 2 legs i should be able to run like Usain Bolt. </p><p></p><p>Again, burnouts are a well-documented phenomenon in sports, both medically and from a performance point of view. </p><p>The evidence i've seen in no way suggests or indicates that burn out is responsible for the Pumas' poor performance. </p><p>I am open-minded and asked you for evidence. I'm still waiting. </p><p></p><p>There are many testable and trackable metrics (number of injuries, meters ran, tackles made, etc) that would point in that direction if your perspective was true. </p><p>None of the ones i've seen, at least to date, supports your hypothesis, thou. None. </p><p></p><p>This is scientific method 101, elementary school stuff. </p><p>You come with a hypothesis, well that hypothesis should have visible and tangible consequences. Provide me with those and i'll be happy to change my mind. </p><p>Claims require evidence.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cruz_del_Sur, post: 966056, member: 55747"] You are giving us your perspective from your side of the pond without an iota of evidence to support your view. Not quite the same. That implies we are not trying to fix it. 3rd time: we are. We just have a very different diagnosis of what the problem is. And we are open to suggestions, but the evidence you've provided is poor at best. The correlation you mentioned is not short of saying that because i have 2 legs i should be able to run like Usain Bolt. Again, burnouts are a well-documented phenomenon in sports, both medically and from a performance point of view. The evidence i've seen in no way suggests or indicates that burn out is responsible for the Pumas' poor performance. I am open-minded and asked you for evidence. I'm still waiting. There are many testable and trackable metrics (number of injuries, meters ran, tackles made, etc) that would point in that direction if your perspective was true. None of the ones i've seen, at least to date, supports your hypothesis, thou. None. This is scientific method 101, elementary school stuff. You come with a hypothesis, well that hypothesis should have visible and tangible consequences. Provide me with those and i'll be happy to change my mind. Claims require evidence. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Argentinian Rugby
Top