Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Premiership Rugby / Premiership Cup
Bath or "The masochists guide to rugby"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LeinsterMan (NotTigsMan)" data-source="post: 1089951" data-attributes="member: 70842"><p>I mean to defend Eddie here (don't want too)</p><p></p><p> Farliegh imo isn't good for bath rugby as a training ground.</p><p> Scragg has 1 start in the championship the 1 year contract makes more sense on the whole.</p><p> JJ staying on a cheaper deal makes far more sense than not having him, really Ojomah and JJ is a good partnership and Francis on the bench covering 10/12 makes sense also.</p><p></p><p> It depends what was the reason for bringing EdG in? It look like a case that Hooper was over his head and he came in to apparently steady the ship obviously didn't work, but was he wrong to.</p><p></p><p> And let's be real Bath as the club don't want Hooper fired it's clear by the fact he's had 100 different ***les already. Head coach to DOR to Head of rugby to General manager. Can he as chairman sack Hooper if Craig as owner doesn't want him sacked (prob a requirement when EdG came in was Hooper has to remain).</p><p></p><p> If I was a bath fan I would be more worried about all these leaks coming out from one side to cover their ass though, reminds me of Tigers under the last CEO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LeinsterMan (NotTigsMan), post: 1089951, member: 70842"] I mean to defend Eddie here (don’t want too) Farliegh imo isn’t good for bath rugby as a training ground. Scragg has 1 start in the championship the 1 year contract makes more sense on the whole. JJ staying on a cheaper deal makes far more sense than not having him, really Ojomah and JJ is a good partnership and Francis on the bench covering 10/12 makes sense also. It depends what was the reason for bringing EdG in? It look like a case that Hooper was over his head and he came in to apparently steady the ship obviously didn’t work, but was he wrong to. And let’s be real Bath as the club don’t want Hooper fired it’s clear by the fact he’s had 100 different ***les already. Head coach to DOR to Head of rugby to General manager. Can he as chairman sack Hooper if Craig as owner doesn’t want him sacked (prob a requirement when EdG came in was Hooper has to remain). If I was a bath fan I would be more worried about all these leaks coming out from one side to cover their ass though, reminds me of Tigers under the last CEO. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Premiership Rugby / Premiership Cup
Bath or "The masochists guide to rugby"
Top