Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
2021 British & Irish Lions Tour
British and Irish Lions Tour: Referee Chat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TRF_heineken" data-source="post: 865684" data-attributes="member: 40658"><p>Well, that's what I think everybody wants to know... As far as I know, the TMO protocol was simplified this year to revert back to the old protocol system, and that the TMO can only be involved with acts of foul play, or in the process of a try being scored.</p><p></p><p>But now, along with the TMO's assistance, the referee has the benefit of viewing the big screen and making the call even before the TMO gives him feedback. And this has been seen a lot in Super Rugby where something is shown on the big screen, and then the ref would stop play and review the incident. But again, it's for foul play.</p><p></p><p>Are there any other examples or footage to show that a similar thing has happened in another match?</p><p></p><p>If we look at the footage, when Poite gave the original penalty. You can see Garces walking on as if he's going to stand in the corner or behind the posts. Now this to me shows that he didn't have a problem with the immediate on field decision by his counterpart. But only after the footage was shown, the decision was changed. And here is where I have a problem with the system. footage was shown which had an effect on the outcome that didn't result in foul play nor in a try being scored. So why was this footage then used to change an original decision?? Surely if it's not a TMO protocol that has been broken, then it has to be the AR's or even the Referee's protocols that has been broken.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TRF_heineken, post: 865684, member: 40658"] Well, that's what I think everybody wants to know... As far as I know, the TMO protocol was simplified this year to revert back to the old protocol system, and that the TMO can only be involved with acts of foul play, or in the process of a try being scored. But now, along with the TMO's assistance, the referee has the benefit of viewing the big screen and making the call even before the TMO gives him feedback. And this has been seen a lot in Super Rugby where something is shown on the big screen, and then the ref would stop play and review the incident. But again, it's for foul play. Are there any other examples or footage to show that a similar thing has happened in another match? If we look at the footage, when Poite gave the original penalty. You can see Garces walking on as if he's going to stand in the corner or behind the posts. Now this to me shows that he didn't have a problem with the immediate on field decision by his counterpart. But only after the footage was shown, the decision was changed. And here is where I have a problem with the system. footage was shown which had an effect on the outcome that didn't result in foul play nor in a try being scored. So why was this footage then used to change an original decision?? Surely if it's not a TMO protocol that has been broken, then it has to be the AR's or even the Referee's protocols that has been broken. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
2021 British & Irish Lions Tour
British and Irish Lions Tour: Referee Chat
Top