Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Premiership Rugby / Premiership Cup
Denny Solomona in trouble again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TRF_Olyy" data-source="post: 899574" data-attributes="member: 34990"><p>Having read it, the whole thing seems dodgy</p><p></p><p>"d. The video footage was entirely supportive of Mr Shillcock's account and, although the words used cannot be heard, on close analysis the words Mr Shillcock alleges were used can be made out;"</p><p>So can they be heard or can't they? It says the assistant didn't hear anything, no microphone heard anything, and Hammond, who stood right next to them, didn't hear it.</p><p>(This was dismissed by the RFU so there's literally zero evidence in their findings)</p><p></p><p></p><p>"g. In walking over to the referee when he had not been called, Mr Solomona demonstrates he was aware he had done something wrong;"</p><p>Well yeah, he was having push and shove handbags with Shilcock and then the referee blew for a penalty - he walked over thinking the penalty was because of the scuffle but it was actually because of the tackle beforehand.</p><p></p><p></p><p>"h. Mr Solomona's account of what happened in the changing room did not stack up. Mr Shillcock was consistent in his account that Mr Solomona had apologised to him and his account was to be preferred."</p><p>They both said they apologised to each other for the scuffle, neither of them mentioned any use of any slurs in their statements when talking about the apology.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The whole thing boils down to:</p><p>Denny says he called him a f**kwit</p><p>Shilcock says he called him a f**got</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TRF_Olyy, post: 899574, member: 34990"] Having read it, the whole thing seems dodgy "d. The video footage was entirely supportive of Mr Shillcock’s account and, although the words used cannot be heard, on close analysis the words Mr Shillcock alleges were used can be made out;" So can they be heard or can't they? It says the assistant didn't hear anything, no microphone heard anything, and Hammond, who stood right next to them, didn't hear it. (This was dismissed by the RFU so there's literally zero evidence in their findings) "g. In walking over to the referee when he had not been called, Mr Solomona demonstrates he was aware he had done something wrong;" Well yeah, he was having push and shove handbags with Shilcock and then the referee blew for a penalty - he walked over thinking the penalty was because of the scuffle but it was actually because of the tackle beforehand. "h. Mr Solomona’s account of what happened in the changing room did not stack up. Mr Shillcock was consistent in his account that Mr Solomona had apologised to him and his account was to be preferred." They both said they apologised to each other for the scuffle, neither of them mentioned any use of any slurs in their statements when talking about the apology. The whole thing boils down to: Denny says he called him a f**kwit Shilcock says he called him a f**got [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Premiership Rugby / Premiership Cup
Denny Solomona in trouble again
Top