Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
ELV talk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GimleyUK" data-source="post: 254921"><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Charles @ Mar 28 2009, 07:22 AM) <a href="http://index.php?act=findpost&pid=387401" target="_blank"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div></p><p></p><p>I think the maul was the most boring thing in rugby and technically, with the player at the back in possession of the ball, you have to make a rule exception to include the maul, so that the players in front of the ball are not off side.</p><p></p><p>If the rule allowing a maul to be dropped by a defending team was scrapped then maybe a rule not making exception of the behind the ball off side rule would make a maul more contestable as a defense would have access to the ball, as it would have to be at the front of the maul, and not untouchable at the back.</p><p></p><p>I would like to see any variations in the Rules lean towards making the game simpler to referee and easier to watch, I don't believe these ELVs really did that, it was more a case of the IRB asking referees to become more strict whilst offering less opportunity for a referee to award penalties.</p><p></p><p></p><p>1. Make the Rugby more contestable at the set piece, straight feeds at scrums, straight throws at line outs, no dropping the maul but no player offside at a maul either.</p><p></p><p></p><p>2. Not allowed to lay the ball back after the tackle. When tackled a player tackled and the tackler must not touch the ball. further players enter from either end and stay on their feet else they may not contest for the ball either. Illegal attempts first to be punished by free kick, consecutive infringements a penalty, and any further consecutive infringement punished with a yellow card. Zero tollerance for slowing the ball, whilst allowing for honest mistakes.</p><p></p><p>3. Touch judges to referee the blind side of the scrum</p><p></p><p>4. Persistent infringers resulting in negative play, (players who Persistently slow ball in defense, who prevent attackers from releasing the ball, who try to play offside, who persistently play the referee more than the game etc etc etc), who are renown as the best cheaters, to be punished for cheating. It is a mockery of our sport when the Greatest Players are also lauded as the Greatest Cheats.</p><p></p><p>5. Convictions by any body of Rugby management, local, national or IRB for "Eye Gouging" or any form of un-necisary malicious body harming and such like foul play to result in an unquestionable life ban.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GimleyUK, post: 254921"] <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Charles @ Mar 28 2009, 07:22 AM) [url='index.php?act=findpost&pid=387401']<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/url]</div> I think the maul was the most boring thing in rugby and technically, with the player at the back in possession of the ball, you have to make a rule exception to include the maul, so that the players in front of the ball are not off side. If the rule allowing a maul to be dropped by a defending team was scrapped then maybe a rule not making exception of the behind the ball off side rule would make a maul more contestable as a defense would have access to the ball, as it would have to be at the front of the maul, and not untouchable at the back. I would like to see any variations in the Rules lean towards making the game simpler to referee and easier to watch, I don't believe these ELVs really did that, it was more a case of the IRB asking referees to become more strict whilst offering less opportunity for a referee to award penalties. 1. Make the Rugby more contestable at the set piece, straight feeds at scrums, straight throws at line outs, no dropping the maul but no player offside at a maul either. 2. Not allowed to lay the ball back after the tackle. When tackled a player tackled and the tackler must not touch the ball. further players enter from either end and stay on their feet else they may not contest for the ball either. Illegal attempts first to be punished by free kick, consecutive infringements a penalty, and any further consecutive infringement punished with a yellow card. Zero tollerance for slowing the ball, whilst allowing for honest mistakes. 3. Touch judges to referee the blind side of the scrum 4. Persistent infringers resulting in negative play, (players who Persistently slow ball in defense, who prevent attackers from releasing the ball, who try to play offside, who persistently play the referee more than the game etc etc etc), who are renown as the best cheaters, to be punished for cheating. It is a mockery of our sport when the Greatest Players are also lauded as the Greatest Cheats. 5. Convictions by any body of Rugby management, local, national or IRB for "Eye Gouging" or any form of un-necisary malicious body harming and such like foul play to result in an unquestionable life ban. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
ELV talk
Top