Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
England players set to learn fate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TRF_Olyy" data-source="post: 328776" data-attributes="member: 34990"><p>It's a crying shame that Barkley is omitted.</p><p>If he's not used at 12, at least put him at 21, he's more useful there than Wilkinson, as he's a damn good 12, a decent 10 and is as accurate (if not more so these days) than Wilko with the boot</p><p>Having said that, i'd rather </p><p>10. Flood</p><p>12. Barkley</p><p>21. Hodgson <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TRF_Olyy, post: 328776, member: 34990"] It's a crying shame that Barkley is omitted. If he's not used at 12, at least put him at 21, he's more useful there than Wilkinson, as he's a damn good 12, a decent 10 and is as accurate (if not more so these days) than Wilko with the boot Having said that, i'd rather 10. Flood 12. Barkley 21. Hodgson :p [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
England players set to learn fate
Top