- Joined
- Nov 25, 2010
- Messages
- 5,771
- Reaction score
- 2,165
with no authority i speak for kiwis here
reading through more AB centric forums and the concensus was very much about the things we did wrong and that whilst England were not perfect...even rough in some areas...they were better than us and most importantly more consistant over the 80min, weathered a fast start from the AB's and ground their way back and comfotable at the end
Personally i think even in the first 20mins when we scored...england looked more up for it, hitting the ball at pace and throwing them selves at the defence fearlessly...we seem to take the ball stationary and then take the hit limply
re the ref, lots of kiwis also believe we were copping some bad calls, i think we can probably all just start to accept they can be bad...more often than they should be...but very rarely actually favouring one team over the other a whole game and so the kiwis claiming the ref cost them or the english claiming to have won against 16...should both realise it comes across as weak
reading through more AB centric forums and the concensus was very much about the things we did wrong and that whilst England were not perfect...even rough in some areas...they were better than us and most importantly more consistant over the 80min, weathered a fast start from the AB's and ground their way back and comfotable at the end
Personally i think even in the first 20mins when we scored...england looked more up for it, hitting the ball at pace and throwing them selves at the defence fearlessly...we seem to take the ball stationary and then take the hit limply
re the ref, lots of kiwis also believe we were copping some bad calls, i think we can probably all just start to accept they can be bad...more often than they should be...but very rarely actually favouring one team over the other a whole game and so the kiwis claiming the ref cost them or the english claiming to have won against 16...should both realise it comes across as weak