Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
Archived
Rugby World Cup 2007
England vs USA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Triniquint" data-source="post: 142959"><p>I hope you're right, Teh Mite. Like I said in an earlier thread, I watch England's matches with hope, and keep giving them the benefit of the doubt. This ran out whilst watching that match against the USA, and I was gutted. Each time I saw Worsley, he ran two paces and dropped to the floor. They seemed to fanny about with the ball, and it was slow, slow, slow coming out, and as they fannied about the Eagles were smashing them off it. And when it did come out, they fumbled it like nervous girls as if they didn't know what to do with it! I honestly couldn't believe my eyes. In truth, I still don't especially rate the Boks. Yes, they have Habana; yes they are meant to have rampaging forwards, and a solid pack etc - but somehow they don't - for me - carry the danger the Aussies, ABs, Pumas, or Ireland have. However, unless England start to perform to their capabilities, they look at this stage in big trouble. It may well be, though, that the all the NH teams are going to perform like this given France's loss to Argentina, Italy's battering off the All Blacks, and England's ineptitude against USA. The Aussies cricket score against Japan doesn't bode well either - so I sincerely hope you're right.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>It'll be interesting to see how Scotland does against Portugal, and Ireland against Namibia, and Wales v Canada today. These too ought to be cricket scores. I wonder what the reaction will be if they're not?</p><p></p><p>Canada may be a surprise. That's the good thing about this tourney so far. It's uncertain.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Triniquint, post: 142959"] I hope you're right, Teh Mite. Like I said in an earlier thread, I watch England's matches with hope, and keep giving them the benefit of the doubt. This ran out whilst watching that match against the USA, and I was gutted. Each time I saw Worsley, he ran two paces and dropped to the floor. They seemed to fanny about with the ball, and it was slow, slow, slow coming out, and as they fannied about the Eagles were smashing them off it. And when it did come out, they fumbled it like nervous girls as if they didn't know what to do with it! I honestly couldn't believe my eyes. In truth, I still don't especially rate the Boks. Yes, they have Habana; yes they are meant to have rampaging forwards, and a solid pack etc - but somehow they don't - for me - carry the danger the Aussies, ABs, Pumas, or Ireland have. However, unless England start to perform to their capabilities, they look at this stage in big trouble. It may well be, though, that the all the NH teams are going to perform like this given France's loss to Argentina, Italy's battering off the All Blacks, and England's ineptitude against USA. The Aussies cricket score against Japan doesn't bode well either - so I sincerely hope you're right. It'll be interesting to see how Scotland does against Portugal, and Ireland against Namibia, and Wales v Canada today. These too ought to be cricket scores. I wonder what the reaction will be if they're not? Canada may be a surprise. That's the good thing about this tourney so far. It's uncertain. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Archived
Rugby World Cup 2007
England vs USA
Top