Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
Archived
Rugby World Cup 2007
England vs USA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Substitute" data-source="post: 143319"><p>Not Kiwi bashing more just making an observation. An american spotted it to. If England were to do spear tackles like that I would condemn whosoever did as much as the aforementioned New Zealanders, like I condened Vickery.</p><p></p><p>There can be no place for serious fouls in the game and as an observation New Zealand seem to get away with a few. And of course England use foul play, difference is we get binned and cited alot more.</p><p></p><p>And the world cup goes to the best side in that year, not to the most consistent. Alll world cup champions are as good as each other as they've acheived the same. What happens after the world cup is of no relevance as to whether a side dserves the trophy or not. It's not a contract to play ntertaining rugby, it is merely a premise to show that at that time you could beat everyone. You can't devalue a world cup because of the performances that follow.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Substitute, post: 143319"] Not Kiwi bashing more just making an observation. An american spotted it to. If England were to do spear tackles like that I would condemn whosoever did as much as the aforementioned New Zealanders, like I condened Vickery. There can be no place for serious fouls in the game and as an observation New Zealand seem to get away with a few. And of course England use foul play, difference is we get binned and cited alot more. And the world cup goes to the best side in that year, not to the most consistent. Alll world cup champions are as good as each other as they've acheived the same. What happens after the world cup is of no relevance as to whether a side dserves the trophy or not. It's not a contract to play ntertaining rugby, it is merely a premise to show that at that time you could beat everyone. You can't devalue a world cup because of the performances that follow. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Archived
Rugby World Cup 2007
England vs USA
Top