Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
England’s tour to Australia thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Derpus" data-source="post: 1093321" data-attributes="member: 76427"><p>I think this is a bit of a hangover from the Cheika 'Australian way' **** that saw Australia stuck in their 22 for the majority of his tenure post 2015 (similar to how the Wallabies are perceived as being unable to scrum despite it being a strength with guys like Tupou and Bell running around).</p><p></p><p>Rennie has, from the start, emphasised the need for an effective kicking game. Part of why 50-22 was introduced was to force the SR sides to kick more. Its also worth noting that set piece was a key strength for the Brumbies and the Waratahs (before they fell apart in the finals). The Wallabies finally have the cattle for a balanced backrow and Rennie has moved well away from the two openside model Cheika favoured.</p><p></p><p>I expect the Wallabies will be kicking more than you expect with the intention of putting pressure on the English lineout and maul. Remains to be seen whether the young/inexperienced guys can execute at a level sufficient to put an experienced England pack under pressure, though.</p><p></p><p>Its also worth noting Tupou, arguably our best player, is injured and his partner is expecting. So we might not see him until the third test (or at all).</p><p></p><p>I'd honestly be satisfied with one win in three and two competitive performances that show the young guys are on the right track and we are developing a balanced game plan. A whitewash would suck but I wouldn't be shocked if it happens.</p><p></p><p>I'm also expecting some pretty limp crowds. Sales are below expectations/hopes I believe.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Derpus, post: 1093321, member: 76427"] I think this is a bit of a hangover from the Cheika 'Australian way' **** that saw Australia stuck in their 22 for the majority of his tenure post 2015 (similar to how the Wallabies are perceived as being unable to scrum despite it being a strength with guys like Tupou and Bell running around). Rennie has, from the start, emphasised the need for an effective kicking game. Part of why 50-22 was introduced was to force the SR sides to kick more. Its also worth noting that set piece was a key strength for the Brumbies and the Waratahs (before they fell apart in the finals). The Wallabies finally have the cattle for a balanced backrow and Rennie has moved well away from the two openside model Cheika favoured. I expect the Wallabies will be kicking more than you expect with the intention of putting pressure on the English lineout and maul. Remains to be seen whether the young/inexperienced guys can execute at a level sufficient to put an experienced England pack under pressure, though. Its also worth noting Tupou, arguably our best player, is injured and his partner is expecting. So we might not see him until the third test (or at all). I'd honestly be satisfied with one win in three and two competitive performances that show the young guys are on the right track and we are developing a balanced game plan. A whitewash would suck but I wouldn't be shocked if it happens. I'm also expecting some pretty limp crowds. Sales are below expectations/hopes I believe. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
England’s tour to Australia thread
Top