Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
General Gaming Chat
First Review of Cricket 2005 from OXM UK.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Los Lover" data-source="post: 27179"><p>God EA are just so fricking utterly predictable....I am so glad I have avoided pre-ordering this game and showing discipline. Even with all our apparent "negativity" - it actually looks even worse than we said..lol!!! what a bunch of c**** EA actually are.</p><p></p><p>You want money and that's all you care about? well f*** you - this time you're getting half as much *****.</p><p></p><p>sucked in....</p><p></p><p>take that review and minus 1 - 1.5 of every score if you are hardcore gamer I bet - which makes that review utterly attrocious - a prettier, worse-playing cricket 2004 - unbelievable.</p><p></p><p>only good thing is that he said it was hard - which means it might present some sort of challenge finally - </p><p></p><p>my highest score on ea's previous version was 445 by Steve Waugh and 387 by Astle</p><p></p><p>highest team score in test - 1011....yeah hard game. <img src="http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </p><p></p><p>but the main point EA is this - as reveiw states - your game is =</p><p></p><p>T - O - O...</p><p></p><p></p><p>S...............L.....................O.............................W.</p><p></p><p>we don't feel immersed -so we don't want to spend three hours playing one 22/22 game dickheads!! what rejects.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Los Lover, post: 27179"] God EA are just so fricking utterly predictable....I am so glad I have avoided pre-ordering this game and showing discipline. Even with all our apparent "negativity" - it actually looks even worse than we said..lol!!! what a bunch of c**** EA actually are. You want money and that's all you care about? well f*** you - this time you're getting half as much *****. sucked in.... take that review and minus 1 - 1.5 of every score if you are hardcore gamer I bet - which makes that review utterly attrocious - a prettier, worse-playing cricket 2004 - unbelievable. only good thing is that he said it was hard - which means it might present some sort of challenge finally - my highest score on ea's previous version was 445 by Steve Waugh and 387 by Astle highest team score in test - 1011....yeah hard game. [img]http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif[/img] but the main point EA is this - as reveiw states - your game is = T - O - O... S...............L.....................O.............................W. we don't feel immersed -so we don't want to spend three hours playing one 22/22 game dickheads!! what rejects. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
General Gaming Chat
First Review of Cricket 2005 from OXM UK.
Top