Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Form Wallabies side after latest round of S14
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BLR" data-source="post: 184559"><p>First off, don't you think it's a little late for Mortlock to move positions? I mean, he isn't the youngest of blokes anymore....</p><p></p><p>Secondly even if he did move to inside why would he automatically be a Wallabies contender? Look at the Saders team, we have an inside center who is a ball player and an outside centre who is the bash and crash them kind of player...why would Deans want two bash and crash players in the centres if that is not the way he does things....besides, how would two players in the centres of that description benefit us?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BLR, post: 184559"] First off, don't you think it's a little late for Mortlock to move positions? I mean, he isn't the youngest of blokes anymore.... Secondly even if he did move to inside why would he automatically be a Wallabies contender? Look at the Saders team, we have an inside center who is a ball player and an outside centre who is the bash and crash them kind of player...why would Deans want two bash and crash players in the centres if that is not the way he does things....besides, how would two players in the centres of that description benefit us? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Form Wallabies side after latest round of S14
Top