A
An Tarbh
Guest
A resounding yes for me, without doubt the greatest scrumhalf of all time and scorer of the greatest try of all time. Fantastic captain as well. True legend.
Um.... :unsure: Sorry, but Greegs is probably the greatest player the brumbies have ever seen, just chuck a good forward pack ahead of him and shi-bang! He's still a superstar. Without a good forward pack and he does play like sh*t, his one problem... :cryy:Originally posted by SaintsFan_Webby@Mar 25 2006, 08:51 PM
Just waiting for; "Hes crap, george gregan iz tha bom!!!11!!"
Wow special school clearly hasn't done you any favours. The point of this forum is to nominate someone who we think should be in the Hall of Fame, make the case and leave it up to the other members, that way we get more rugby related discussion.Originally posted by THE CHIROPRACTOR101@Mar 26 2006, 02:36 AM
did u not read my post under michael jones?..
these polls are f***ing stupid...how dare we vote him in?...votings for useless people like helen clarke,tony blair and president dubya..
voting is not for men who actually contribrute to there communites...
trust an tarbh to be stupid
Good idea, like the sound of it.Originally posted by BigTen@Mar 26 2006, 01:02 PM
This is a pretty obvious one really and it doesn't need to go to a vote.
I think that a better way to decide if a player gets to go in the hall of fame would be for the members of this website to nominate a board of selectors - maybe five or seven selectors and then once a player is nominated other members could write up arguments on whether the player gets to be in the hall of fame or not.
Maybe the jury (I think jury sounds better than board of selectors) could be six members so to get in you'd need at least four votes.
Members could be changed on a reasonable regular basis - you get 1 month on and then have one month off before you'd get back on again.
I think that this would be a much better method to use.
And back to Edwards - I just want to confirm that it is a yes from me.
Exactly.Originally posted by SaintsFan_Webby+Mar 27 2006, 01:12 AM--><!--QuoteBegin-BigTenGood idea, like the sound of it.@Mar 26 2006, 01:02 PM
This is a pretty obvious one really and it doesn't need to go to a vote.
I think that a better way to decide if a player gets to go in the hall of fame would be for the members of this website to nominate a board of selectors - maybe five or seven selectors and then once a player is nominated other members could write up arguments on whether the player gets to be in the hall of fame or not.
Maybe the jury (I think jury sounds better than board of selectors) could be six members so to get in you'd need at least four votes.
Members could be changed on a reasonable regular basis - you get 1 month on and then have one month off before you'd get back on again.
I think that this would be a much better method to use.
And back to Edwards - I just want to confirm that it is a yes from me.
However, I wouldn't change the jury every month, I'd leave some consistency until it was felt a change was needed. [/b]