Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
Gettin players on the ball at PACE
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="USArugger" data-source="post: 26525"><p>I still play because it's the only thing out there. WL could be so much better. I understand the desire to have all the different competitions and tours and that is fun. However, for me in most games the thing that keeps me playing after I've done all the "gee whiz" and won all the trophies is the dynasty/career mode. For example, recruiting keeps me glued to NCAA Football. After I win the national ***le I switch to the worst team out there and try to build them up to a dynasty. There needs to be player turnover so you can go 10-20 seasons but Umaga and Howlett will retire and some young guys come up and take their places. Players can improve from year to year in different areas or as they get older they can start to get slower. So many things that they could do. You could be a player and start at a low club level and work your way up and you control whatever team you are on.</p><p></p><p>My big question. I have wondered if the game is structured the way it is because the focus is on non-USA buyers? Is it more important for the European or SH guy to have a certain style of video game that is maybe more true to the actual game with Lions, Super 12, World Cup, etc... rather than this career/dynasty mode like I see in all the US games like football, baseball, NASCAR, etc... or would you guys like to see a more in-depth dynasty mode at the expense of reality. (Maybe they would have to create some sort of fake world league and then have some sort of "draft" from the "teenager" sides and you could build your fake club from San Antonio Texas)</p><p></p><p>I would be interested in your comments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="USArugger, post: 26525"] I still play because it's the only thing out there. WL could be so much better. I understand the desire to have all the different competitions and tours and that is fun. However, for me in most games the thing that keeps me playing after I've done all the "gee whiz" and won all the trophies is the dynasty/career mode. For example, recruiting keeps me glued to NCAA Football. After I win the national ***le I switch to the worst team out there and try to build them up to a dynasty. There needs to be player turnover so you can go 10-20 seasons but Umaga and Howlett will retire and some young guys come up and take their places. Players can improve from year to year in different areas or as they get older they can start to get slower. So many things that they could do. You could be a player and start at a low club level and work your way up and you control whatever team you are on. My big question. I have wondered if the game is structured the way it is because the focus is on non-USA buyers? Is it more important for the European or SH guy to have a certain style of video game that is maybe more true to the actual game with Lions, Super 12, World Cup, etc... rather than this career/dynasty mode like I see in all the US games like football, baseball, NASCAR, etc... or would you guys like to see a more in-depth dynasty mode at the expense of reality. (Maybe they would have to create some sort of fake world league and then have some sort of "draft" from the "teenager" sides and you could build your fake club from San Antonio Texas) I would be interested in your comments. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
Gettin players on the ball at PACE
Top