Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
All Other Sports
GOAT - The eternal debate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RedruthRFC" data-source="post: 1087639" data-attributes="member: 58362"><p>On balance, I tend to agree. IMO, a lot of Ronnie's GOAT claim is based on his longevity. When you talk about world ***les, Hendry's feat of winning 7 ***les in 14 years is much more impressive than Ronnie's of 7 in 30. Similarly, Hendry spent more consecutive years at number 1 than Ronnie has managed in total over his whole career. I wouldn't mind betting that the 100 / 147 record doesn't stack up so well against Hendry's if you have access to the data in order to break it down by frames played.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RedruthRFC, post: 1087639, member: 58362"] On balance, I tend to agree. IMO, a lot of Ronnie's GOAT claim is based on his longevity. When you talk about world ***les, Hendry's feat of winning 7 ***les in 14 years is much more impressive than Ronnie's of 7 in 30. Similarly, Hendry spent more consecutive years at number 1 than Ronnie has managed in total over his whole career. I wouldn't mind betting that the 100 / 147 record doesn't stack up so well against Hendry's if you have access to the data in order to break it down by frames played. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
All Other Sports
GOAT - The eternal debate
Top