Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
All Other Sports
GOAT - The eternal debate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cruz_del_Sur" data-source="post: 1090295" data-attributes="member: 55747"><p>That is suicidal. You'd score 4-5 goals all game and still lose. Maldini and thuram would spent all the half time break screaming at their team mates. Rijkaard wouldnt have much fun either. </p><p></p><p>When considering these sort of things you need to think how people compliment each other, balance, chemistry. </p><p>That's why not many would put modric/kroos/casemiro or iniesta/xavi/busquets in their team, yet those two are arguably the two best midfield in the history of the sport. Iniesta/xavi/busquests were formidable at creating spaces, and that's what you need when you have a trio like messi/pedro/villa. </p><p>Having said that, if i didnt know the rest of the team i'd say kroos/casemiro/modric is more flexible and could adapt to more scenarios. </p><p></p><p>This is all, again, very complex. Xavi, best spanish player ever in my book, would have been an average joe had he not crossed paths with messi. Just look at BCN's 2006 campaign. He was 26 at the time, not like he was 18 or just arrived at the club. He wasnt even a starter. </p><p>But he brought to the table exactly what was needed at that specific point in time for that specific team.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cruz_del_Sur, post: 1090295, member: 55747"] That is suicidal. You'd score 4-5 goals all game and still lose. Maldini and thuram would spent all the half time break screaming at their team mates. Rijkaard wouldnt have much fun either. When considering these sort of things you need to think how people compliment each other, balance, chemistry. That's why not many would put modric/kroos/casemiro or iniesta/xavi/busquets in their team, yet those two are arguably the two best midfield in the history of the sport. Iniesta/xavi/busquests were formidable at creating spaces, and that's what you need when you have a trio like messi/pedro/villa. Having said that, if i didnt know the rest of the team i'd say kroos/casemiro/modric is more flexible and could adapt to more scenarios. This is all, again, very complex. Xavi, best spanish player ever in my book, would have been an average joe had he not crossed paths with messi. Just look at BCN's 2006 campaign. He was 26 at the time, not like he was 18 or just arrived at the club. He wasnt even a starter. But he brought to the table exactly what was needed at that specific point in time for that specific team. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
All Other Sports
GOAT - The eternal debate
Top