Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
Health News
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Which Tyler" data-source="post: 1129284" data-attributes="member: 73592"><p>For biomechanical stuff... the physio is worth an extra 7 points in scrabble.</p><p></p><p>There are differences in training, but those shouldn't be relevant for anyone who's been in practice for a few years; then it's down to what patients an individual ends up seeing, and what further training is done post-grad.</p><p>We're all trying to do more-or-less the same thing with more-or-less the same tools.</p><p></p><p>So... for biomechanical stuff; there are greater differences between individuals of each profession than there are between the professions per se (same goes if you add osteopathy into the discussion)</p><p></p><p>Out in the real world... and with a liberal use of stereotypes... Physios have a shallower knowledge of a wider range of issues than chiro.s typically do more exercise-based care with hands-on as an optional bolt-on, whilst chiros would know more about fewer things and typically do more hands-on care with exercise as a (much less optional) bolt-on. Equally, physios would tend to be larger practices with more pooled equipment, but also more individuals with different specialisations. But that's all pretty stereotyped and not terribly accurate.</p><p></p><p>ETA: Oh, and chiropractic is self-evidently superior... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Which Tyler, post: 1129284, member: 73592"] For biomechanical stuff... the physio is worth an extra 7 points in scrabble. There are differences in training, but those shouldn't be relevant for anyone who's been in practice for a few years; then it's down to what patients an individual ends up seeing, and what further training is done post-grad. We're all trying to do more-or-less the same thing with more-or-less the same tools. So... for biomechanical stuff; there are greater differences between individuals of each profession than there are between the professions per se (same goes if you add osteopathy into the discussion) Out in the real world... and with a liberal use of stereotypes... Physios have a shallower knowledge of a wider range of issues than chiro.s typically do more exercise-based care with hands-on as an optional bolt-on, whilst chiros would know more about fewer things and typically do more hands-on care with exercise as a (much less optional) bolt-on. Equally, physios would tend to be larger practices with more pooled equipment, but also more individuals with different specialisations. But that's all pretty stereotyped and not terribly accurate. ETA: Oh, and chiropractic is self-evidently superior... :) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
Health News
Top