Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
Archived
Rugby World Cup 2007
IRB criteria for RWC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="galota" data-source="post: 122685"><p>If the pools are made based in the 2003 RWC, then I rest my case. It shows the intention of the IRB to mantain the satu quo. Let us say :</p><p></p><p>Home nations + France + Aus, SA, and NZ to the quarter finals</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Anyway it seems hard to understand for some people , who see this as "normal" regardless the real level of he teams. </p><p></p><p>And don´ forget what some referees had done to help to this cause. I can name 2 cases against Argentina.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>If the level of some teams like Pumas or Italy keeps rising I wonder what the iIRB will do to protect their commercial interests</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="galota, post: 122685"] If the pools are made based in the 2003 RWC, then I rest my case. It shows the intention of the IRB to mantain the satu quo. Let us say : Home nations + France + Aus, SA, and NZ to the quarter finals Anyway it seems hard to understand for some people , who see this as "normal" regardless the real level of he teams. And don´ forget what some referees had done to help to this cause. I can name 2 cases against Argentina. If the level of some teams like Pumas or Italy keeps rising I wonder what the iIRB will do to protect their commercial interests [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Archived
Rugby World Cup 2007
IRB criteria for RWC
Top