F
Fushitsusha
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ak47 @ Oct 14 2009, 02:10 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
This is really only a problem in Australia where rugby league has infected the masses.
The complexity of the rules and interpretations in Union will never be attractive to women, who are half the audience
Women love AFL – It doesn’t matter where they are from, they love AFL:
2 reasons – They wear short shorts, and the rules are simple – There basically aren’t any rules, its simple game which can be explained to women.
Soccer is also farely simple sport to follow – The rules are black n white in most cases.
Rugby Union – Well the amount of times, the commentators disagree with the referee, and then talk about interpretation, and then on top of this – The players standing there with arms in the air, and we get explained by the commentators one thing, then the ref on the TV says another – There is no level ground of comprehention, it’s a farcical farce ‘hands in the ruck’, didn’t stay on feet, came in from the side, deliberate this, unintentional that, accidental this – try telling that to your girl and her friends – They run away.
Rugby League – Well its no coincidence this sport derived from union, and had its worse year of officiating, and also has trouble attracting women to the game, partly due to off field stuff, but the complexity of the rules also play a role. League seems to posses the same obsession at commentary and officiating levels to look into the smallest things and make a call, which turns into a rule. The problem is again interpretation. The new obstruction rule is shambles – its interpretated.
I don’t know how they can fix it – but it turns women away from sport, who only want to know how points are scored – What the ref does better be easy to understand, and in league and union it isn’t.[/b]
This is really only a problem in Australia where rugby league has infected the masses.