June International Test: Australia vs. England [1st Test] (11/06/2016)

Discussion in 'International Test Matches' started by TRF_heineken, Jun 6, 2016.

  1. TRF_heineken

    TRF_heineken RIP #J9

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    10,093
    Location:
    Polokwane, South Africa
    Country Flag:

    South Africa

    Club or Nation:

    South Africa

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    Location: Suncorp Stadium, Brisbane
    Time: 12:00 CAT (SA, GMT+2)

    TEAMS

    Australia: 15 Israel Folau, 14 Dane Haylett-Petty, 13 Tevita Kuridrani, 12 Samu Kerevi, 11 Rob Horne, 10 Bernard Foley, 9 Nick Phipps, 8 David Pocock, 7 Michael Hooper, 6 Scott Fardy, 5 Rob Simmons, 4 Rory Arnold, 3 Greg Holmes, 2 Stephen Moore (captain), 1 Scott Sio

    Substitutes:16 Tatafu Polota-Nau, 17 James Slipper, 18 Sekope Kepu, 19 James Horwill, 20 Dean Mumm, 21 Sean McMahon, 22 Nick Frisby, 23 Christian Leali'ifano.

    England: 15 Mike Brown, 14 Anthony Watson, 13 Jonathan Joseph, 12 Luther Burrell, 11 Marland Yarde, 10 Owen Farrell, 9 Ben Youngs, 8 Billy Vunipola, 7 James Haskell, 6 Chris Robshaw, 5 George Kruis, 4 Maro Itoje, 3 Dan Cole, 2 Dylan Hartley (captain), 1 Mako Vunipola

    Substitutes: 16 Luke Cowan-Dickie, 17 Matt Mullan, 18 Paul Hill, 19 Joe Launchbury, 20 Courtney Lawes, 21 Danny Care, 22 George Ford, 23 Jack Nowell
     
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2016
  2. Forum Ad Advertisement

  3. ncurd

    ncurd Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2015
    Messages:
    6,145
    Location:
    Gloucestershire
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Bath

    If Eddie's regime so far has taught me anything it's not to speculate too much into teams suggested by the press until its officially announced. I've yet to see a pundit get it right beforehand yet.

    - - - Updated - - -

    [​IMG]
    Well the press got it right for a change surprised Itoje didn't move but obviously Jones thinks it better to keep him in the second row. Feel Nowell is a little hard done by. Ford is the wrong decision in my book but equally I don't think its fair to say its a shocker of a decision.
     
  4. Which Tyler

    Which Tyler Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2015
    Messages:
    3,363
    Location:
    Tewkesbury
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Bath

    The Daily Heil's too busy perving them in the pool
     
  5. Stumpy

    Stumpy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2011
    Messages:
    189
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Saracens

    Could Yarde have been selected as Eddie viewed the game against Wales as more important than the Premiership final? Both had good games that weekend, I thought Nowell was brilliant and arguable the best player on the pitch. Probably not the case but just a thought.
     
  6. NickBD

    NickBD Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2015
    Messages:
    179
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Bradford

    The talking points will be Yarde, the back row and Youngs but Cowen-Dickie over Jamie George is a odd one for me. George would be a better impact sub of the bench.
     
  7. Maverick1987

    Maverick1987 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2012
    Messages:
    2,674
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Leicester

    Lawes and Launchbury on the bench too ...... Some seriously strange calls from Eddie .....
     
  8. Lourens

    Lourens Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Messages:
    468
    Location:
    Pretoria
    Country Flag:

    South Africa

    Club or Nation:

    Blue Bulls

    Agree on Launchbury...I don't know much about England rugby but to leave this guy out of your starting team is madness. Would be the same as leaving Etsebeth out of the Bok starting team. If you need space for Itoje, leave someone else out.
     
  9. ncurd

    ncurd Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2015
    Messages:
    6,145
    Location:
    Gloucestershire
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Bath

    Kruis was arguably better than Itoje during the six nations....moving Itoje to 6 was the only option and Jones has clearly dismissed that idea for now.

    Our strength at Lock is insane and Launchers needs to provide something very special to replace one of Ktoje as neither should be anywhere close to being dropped.
     
  10. Lourens

    Lourens Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Messages:
    468
    Location:
    Pretoria
    Country Flag:

    South Africa

    Club or Nation:

    Blue Bulls

    I never realized that Itoje was seen more as a lock than a loose forward. I honestly thought he played lock out of necessity. Amazing player anyways.
     
  11. stus768

    stus768 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2010
    Messages:
    592
    Considering there are 2 locks on the bench itoje must be covering back row so he can't have dismissed it.
     
  12. ncurd

    ncurd Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2015
    Messages:
    6,145
    Location:
    Gloucestershire
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Bath

    It's an odd one I think he more has it as an option in various scenarios or something to try if the game isn't tight. I think the likely plan will be to play Itoje and Robshaw until the end of the match.

    He's certainly dismissed it as a starting option but probably thinks it better than our current backrow backup options. Honestly the reality is I'm surprised Lawes is on the bench and not Clifford.
     
  13. stus768

    stus768 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2010
    Messages:
    592
    I was very surprised at lawes on the bench.
     
  14. TRF_Peat

    TRF_Peat Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2010
    Messages:
    10,086
    Location:
    London
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Ulster

    Still think Kruis is quite a bit overtalked.

    Guess we'll see. I'm not particularly sold on this being the way to paradise but probably wiser at this point to see if it works.
     
  15. ncurd

    ncurd Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2015
    Messages:
    6,145
    Location:
    Gloucestershire
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Bath

    Honestly I think Launchbury has a higher ceiling than Kruis but Kruis has literally done nothing even remotely close to warrant being dropped. It's a case of incumbent playing rubbish, getting injured or putting in some outstanding shifts yourself. Its one of the problems with strength in depth at what point do you make a switch for a player with more potential when they are playing very well.
     
  16. TRF_Peat

    TRF_Peat Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2010
    Messages:
    10,086
    Location:
    London
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Ulster

    Not playing as well as one of the other players can is, imo, enough to warrant dropping.

    And you make the switch when you think it wins you the next match..

    Not that I'm sure I'd have made the switch given what Kruis means to our line out. I make those points philosophically.

    But I still think he's overrated in general and also being rated on one window, which means the rating is possibly premature.
     
  17. Every Time Ref

    Every Time Ref Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    2,935
    Location:
    London
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Bath

    I also think when a unit within a team is clicking you stick with it unless the argument against is overwhelming. Personally I thought the argument for moving Itoje to the back row was overwhelming given our flankers and Australia's flankers, so disappointed not to see that, however not at all surprised or particularly disappointed that EJ didn't want to break up Krutoje for a different lock (even though I agree that Launchbury is exceptional)

    Nowell a genuine shock, I never really thought that would happen. He's got weaknesses but many strengths, has been playing very well as part of a unit which is basically performing (if there is a weak link to it it's Brown, not him). For me Nowell fitted into a similar category to the Daly-Joseph debate; I don't see the value in replacing a proven international who is playing well with someone who might turn out to be a better option in an area that's largely functioning, when there are other areas which need attention more urgently. I would have preferred continuity on this one, definitely.

    You know what, some odd ones, some I'm not convinced about, some which will be argued both before and after the game I've no doubt ... but let's all take a moment to be grateful that at least Brad Barritt isn't even in the discussion!
     
  18. living sacrifice

    living sacrifice Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,793
    Location:
    Rugby
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Northampton

    I don't know if it's just me but i don't get the whole 'play player X as he has a higher ceiling' thing.

    Players go in and out of form. Some players might never be the best in the world but might not have massive weaknesses in their game. To me your team can never be world class without those types of players in a team.

    Maybe that's just me but for every star you need a balance of players of make little mistakes and don't have any weaknesses.

    Just imagine if we had the depth we at lock for inside centre. Just imagine.......
     
  19. Every Time Ref

    Every Time Ref Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    Messages:
    2,935
    Location:
    London
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Bath

    The reasoning is that any promising player needs international experience to become world class, and there are a limited number of test caps available as there are few international games compared to domestic. It's a tricky balancing act, but you definitely need to choose wisely who to give the precious commodity of international experience to.

    However, I do agree with what you say about players who don't make mistakes being invaluable. It's easy to get carried away with looking for a star in every position, but they don't always exist.
     
  20. TRF_Peat

    TRF_Peat Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2010
    Messages:
    10,086
    Location:
    London
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Ulster

    I mostly agree with that but I don't think the second row should be considered as a unit. I think they should be considered in light of the pack as a whole.

    Does that mean I change them? Probably not today, but given that our pack has a significant weakness in terms of support play and the breakdown, I still remain very much pro-Launchbury as he's the single biggest boost to that available outside of the starting 8.

    Probably an argument to be re-examined after the series rather than now though.

    I'm surprised and not in favour, but I can see the logic. The back line wasn't providing enough physicality; Yarde in changes that. Again, I don't think the back three can be considered a unit in isolation. Arguably it creates a defensive weakness but Nowell had some dodgy moments in the Six Nations anyway.

    You're arguing against something no one's said in this instance and where the player left out is one of the most error free and consistent we have.

    In general though, I'd argue that unless a player makes few mistakes and has very few weaknesses, they're not a star. There's a few monster athletes who are an exception to that rule but for me, stars are players who never drop below a certain threshold and are capable of doing multiple things incredibly well.
     
  21. living sacrifice

    living sacrifice Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,793
    Location:
    Rugby
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Northampton

    I was more mulling it over than arguing a case. It's a lovely problem to have with kruis, launchbury and Itoje, would be made a lot easier if EJ dropped Haskell and or Robshaw.
     
Enjoyed this thread? Register to post your reply - click here!

Share This Page