• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

Larkham or Carter?

Who is the better Fly Half

  • Larkham

    Votes: 6 16.2%
  • Carter

    Votes: 31 83.8%

  • Total voters
    37
Dan Carter. Larkham was a very good player, I rate him along side Andrew Mehrtens. But Daniel Carter is the most complete 1st 5/8th of the modern game, probably ever. Very good goal kicker (Larkham wasn't), great defender, scored more tries and more points per test - and is generally considered the best playmaker.
 
Larkham was, and will always be one of my favorite Australian players...But Carter is one of the greatest players of all time.
 
I never really considered this as a question...carter...by miles
 
**** accidentally voted for Larkham. Don't count that vote.

Got to agree with the others. Carter is one of the best rugby players of all time, extremely well balanced in everything he does.

Larkham was one of the best attacking talents the game has seen, the way he could scythe through the defensive line and throw beautiful flat passes was a sight to behold. He lacked a territorial kicking game though and couldn't goal kick to save his life.
Australia are really missing him now.

If i could choose to play with one of them though it would be Larkham, as a fullback i think it would have been awesome to run on to one of his passes at pace.
 
Last edited:
Larkham was good, carter is great. Hard to compare due to different eras. Both have a good ability to control the game. Carter always seems to have an incredible decision making ability to think on his feet and silky skills. I always loved larkham's ability to slip through defenses almost like they were asleep.
 
Can someone please explain where the term "1st 5/8" comes from?

OT: Dan Carter easily.
 
Can someone please explain where the term "1st 5/8" comes from?

OT: Dan Carter easily.
Forwards are forward.
Halfback is halfway back.
Five eighths (first and second) are 5/8 back.
Three quarters (one centre and two wings) are three quarters way back.
Full back is all the way back.

As opposed to:

Forwards are forward.
Halfbacks are halfway back.
Three quarters (two centres and two wings) are three quarters way back.
Full back is all the way back.
 
Carter. Easily.

But no disrespect to Larkham as he was pretty damaging. Both are definitely top 5 10's ever.
 
Carter. I used to love watching Larkham ghost through holes that weren't there, don't know how he did it! But he wouldnt that much time & space in todays game. As peeps have said he is the complete 5/8. When cooper burst on the scene, he was being touted as the successor to Carter's crown, but he is not the full package. I think from an attack perpsetive he is above DC, but his defence is woeful, decision making at times terrible and he has a long way to go before he gets to Carters level.
 
can anyone find the girly fight larkham had with carlos spencer on youtube? watching it makes me lol
 
Carter. Though Larkham did score a match winning drop goal...
I suppose most people would put Larkham in the top 3 of the pro era. Carter is definitely number one imo.
 
Carter. Though Larkham did score a match winning drop goal...
I suppose most people would put Larkham in the top 3 of the pro era. Carter is definitely number one imo.

I'd probably go top 5-

Daniel Carter
Johnny Wilkinson
Stephen Larkham
Andrew Mehrtens
Carlos Spencer

That'd by mine in order. Probably I'd chuck Ronan O'Gara as 6th.
 
Carter. Though Larkham did score a match winning drop goal...
I suppose most people would put Larkham in the top 3 of the pro era. Carter is definitely number one imo.
So did Carter against the Irish this year. ;)

I'd probably go top 5-

Daniel Carter
Johnny Wilkinson
Stephen Larkham
Andrew Mehrtens
Carlos Spencer

That'd by mine in order. Probably I'd chuck Ronan O'Gara as 6th.
Same with me. Except I'd have Larkham 2nd, still keeping O'Gara 6th.

And then Stephen Donald, obviously.

Obviously.

Who else challenges for the 7th best 5/8th ever? ;)
 
Stephen Donald won the 2011 World Cup for New Zealand, something Carter never has...
 
Bernie was never a "natural" Flyhalf, he was a converted Fullback, who probably would have played most of this career in that position had it not been for the fact that Chris Latham had the spot nailed down during most of both their playing careers
 
Can someone please explain where the term "1st 5/8" comes from?

[thread hijack]

Its a little more involved than ZaFrenchy says

Originally, back in the early years of Rugby, there were many variations on the way the game was played, but essntially there were only two positions. Most of the players were forwards and a few were backs

Forwards were in the scrimmage (which later became known as the "scrummage" or "scrum", but American Football still uses the old term). The backs were known as "tenders" or "tends" (short for goal tenders I think)

However, as teams realised the possible advantages of playing the game behind the scrimmage, the players who stationed themselves between the forwards and tends became known as "half-tends".

As the game evolved, those players became less and less limited to defensive roles and more open to being used to advance the ball forward and then drop back to take up defensive positions, so the "tends" became known as "backs". Over the years, as the game grew in tactical complexity the backs were positioned at different depths behind the scrimmage, and these became known as three quarter backs.

There were also specialised positions developed for the scrum. For example the role of the "wing- forward" (the forerunner of what we would call a flanker today) was to protect the half backs. The first ever test match played was in 1871 between England and Scotland. Each team had twenty players, 13 forwards and 7 backs (3 half backs, one 3/4 back and 3 fullbacks.) Player numbers were reduced to fifteen a few years later (1877?)

In New Zealand and Australia, the backs' position names were further refined, and currently, the way we arrange our back-lines is slightly different from some other countries. For example, in the UK and Europe, the 12 & 13 are both called centres, usually 12 on the left and 13 on the right. This is referred to here as "inside-outside" because each player will alternatively play in the inside centre or outside centre position depending on which way the ball was being passed. However, in New Zealand, only the 13 is a centre, the 12 is referred to as the "2nd 5/8th" (fly-half being the 1st 5/8th), so called because he is positioned half way between the half back (4/8ths) and the three-quarters (6/8ths). Normally the 12 will always play outside the 10 and inside the 13, regardless of which way the ball is being passed. Also, in the NH, the No. 9 is called the "scrum-half" where as in Australia and New Zealand the old term "halfback" is used.

Another oddie is the name "Lock", which currently refers to the two players in the second row who along with the props and hooker, form the "tight five". However, at one time, the Lock was use to refer to what we call the "Number 8" (in South Africa, the "Eightman").

In Rugby League, in some countries, they still call the player at the back of the scrum either "Lock" or "Loose Forward".

[/thread hijack]
 
DC started off his career fairly good as oppose to Larkham who started his Wallaby journey as a fullback I believe and it wasnt a very good start for Larkham. But once he got confident and comfortable, no All Black or Springbok defence was safe.

Like most, its clearly obvious that DC is the total package but Larkhams attack is just as good as DCs.

I thought everyone called the first five eight, first five eight...

DC, Larkham, Mehrts, King Carlos, Morne Steyn, Wilko, Fox, Lynagh, Naas Botha, Neil Jenkins...theres a few good proven first fives/fly halfs.
 

Latest posts

Top