Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
League vs Union...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="esoj" data-source="post: 129890"><p>Well while i agree with the first part of ur post about the expansiveness of Union, i'd have to disagree with you on the commentary part.. i think they are on about par.. and i think that in terms of bias, Phil Gould is a one-eyed frog-headed knobjockey, but other than that league is generally pretty good for bias.. Sterlo, Rabs and Vossy are some of the most down the line commentators you will ever hear. The international Union commentary is littered with bias, and from a 3N point of view, listening to Saffa or NZ commentators as opposed to Aussie ones causes you to see the game form a whole different persepctive, and not always in a good way.</p><p></p><p>[/b]</p></blockquote><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I didn't mention anything about internationals at all. you failed to read my post and have decided to add that in. everyone knows eddie and steveo are the worst when it comes to bias at international level in either code.rabs is defintely an eels supporter and comes through very clearly in his commentary. vossy is the hard one to get a read on who he supports and he basically has no bias at all in his commentary. union guys at club level (super 14) defintely do a better job of not displaying the bias for the team they support in their commentary.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="esoj, post: 129890"] Well while i agree with the first part of ur post about the expansiveness of Union, i'd have to disagree with you on the commentary part.. i think they are on about par.. and i think that in terms of bias, Phil Gould is a one-eyed frog-headed knobjockey, but other than that league is generally pretty good for bias.. Sterlo, Rabs and Vossy are some of the most down the line commentators you will ever hear. The international Union commentary is littered with bias, and from a 3N point of view, listening to Saffa or NZ commentators as opposed to Aussie ones causes you to see the game form a whole different persepctive, and not always in a good way. [/b][/quote] I didn't mention anything about internationals at all. you failed to read my post and have decided to add that in. everyone knows eddie and steveo are the worst when it comes to bias at international level in either code.rabs is defintely an eels supporter and comes through very clearly in his commentary. vossy is the hard one to get a read on who he supports and he basically has no bias at all in his commentary. union guys at club level (super 14) defintely do a better job of not displaying the bias for the team they support in their commentary. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
League vs Union...
Top