Michalak place

[roro89]

What place is the better for michalak 10 ??? 9 ???? 15 ????
Laporte have proprosed the solution ...michalak 15
what do you think about it

 

[Juggernaut]

Best place is at 10.

 

[feicarsinn]

hes the ian harte of rugby bags of ability but cant find a position that suits him properly (btw im not saying ian harte was world class just that he suffered from the same problem)

 

[melon]

I'd really like to seem him play #15 at international level!

For some reason he comes across as a bit of a Latham, I don't have any idea why, but he just does.

 

[shtove]

On the bench. Skrela is France's new Lamaison.

 

[rugby_roots]

I say 10 because of the way he delivers the ball to backs.
Precise passing and very good combination with Jauzion.

 

[firestelab]

Best place is 10 because he's a creative player, good tackler, and he feels the game.

 

[artosaari]

On the bench. Skrela is France's new Lamaison.
[/b]

skrela sucks... michalak plays good at 10 only if JB Elissalde is playing at 9

 

[thomas]

Could Skrela do that -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v74D85fYG00



I don't think so !!

 

[Caledfwlch]

Could Skrela do that -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v74D85fYG00



I don't think so !!

[/b]

Haha of course Skrela could! That team Michalak scored against was Canada for crying out loud!

 

[TongaFan]

Yachvili and Michalak could work well at 9 and 10 (respectively) as Yachvili is a good enough place kicker to take the job from Michalak. That would leave him free to work his creative magic. Unfortunately I don't think Yachvili made the French squad. Does anybody know if he's injured?