Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
My New Idea
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DC" data-source="post: 65236"><p>Well i was sittin there takin a **** earlier today, and i had a brilliant idea. My idea was change what "impact player" is. I dont mean take away their stars, or their particular stats, just change what it means. Believe it or not every team has that impact player, not just the best teams in the world. USA has Mike Hercus for example, and he could easily be an impact player.</p><p></p><p>What i think is that EA should consider what i stated above while selecting the impact players. Not every impact player has to be a 98 or 99 overall. I personally think that each team regardless of skill level should have that impact player, the player with more experience than everyone else. Ok take Mike Hercus again for example, he is what a 78 or something like that overall, but because of his experience and his ability i believe he should earn a "impact player" star. There is no doubt that throughout a game, Hercus can display that he has that X factor which will propel his team through a particular challenge.</p><p></p><p>Do you guys sort of get what im saying?</p><p></p><p>Impact should not necessarily mean that you have to be a 98 or 99 overall, but that you have what it takes to help your team win, and have the X factor needed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DC, post: 65236"] Well i was sittin there takin a **** earlier today, and i had a brilliant idea. My idea was change what "impact player" is. I dont mean take away their stars, or their particular stats, just change what it means. Believe it or not every team has that impact player, not just the best teams in the world. USA has Mike Hercus for example, and he could easily be an impact player. What i think is that EA should consider what i stated above while selecting the impact players. Not every impact player has to be a 98 or 99 overall. I personally think that each team regardless of skill level should have that impact player, the player with more experience than everyone else. Ok take Mike Hercus again for example, he is what a 78 or something like that overall, but because of his experience and his ability i believe he should earn a "impact player" star. There is no doubt that throughout a game, Hercus can display that he has that X factor which will propel his team through a particular challenge. Do you guys sort of get what im saying? Impact should not necessarily mean that you have to be a 98 or 99 overall, but that you have what it takes to help your team win, and have the X factor needed. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
My New Idea
Top