• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

New laws to be trialled. Any thoughts on them?

AndrevD

Academy Player
Joined
Nov 9, 2016
Messages
22
Country Flag
South Africa
Club or Nation
Lions
"Five changes to law will be trialled globally next year after they were approved by World Rugby Council in London this week.

The law changes set to be trialled globally are:

Law 3 Number of Players â€" The Team
3.6 (Uncontested Scrums)
Add (h) Uncontested scrums as a result of a sending off, temporary suspension or injury must be played with eight players per side.
Reasoning: To discourage teams from going to uncontested scrums.

Law 5 Time
Add to 5.7(e) If a penalty is kicked into touch after time has elapsed without touching another player, the referee allows the throw-in to be taken and play continues until the next time the ball becomes dead.
Reasoning: To discourage teams from infringing in the dying moments of the game.

Law 8 Advantage
Add to 8.1(a) When there are multiple penalty infringements by the same team, the referee may allow the captain of the non-offending team to choose the most advantageous of the penalty marks.
Reasoning: To discourage repeat offending when advantage is already being played and to reward teams against whom repeat offending has taken place.

Law 9 Method of Scoring
9.A.1 (points values)
Penalty Try. If a player would probably have scored a try but for foul play by an opponent, a penalty try is awarded. No conversion is attempted.
Value: 7 points
Reasoning: To discourage teams from illegally preventing a probable try from being scored while also saving time on the clock by negating the need for a conversion.

Law 19 Touch and Lineout
Add to definitions on page 117:
• A player who is attempting to bring the ball under control is deemed to be in possession of the ball.
Reasoning: This brings into law something that is already applied in practice. It means that a player “juggling†the ball does not have to be in contact with it at the exact moment of touching the touchline or the ground beyond it for the ball to be deemed to be in touch. This makes it easier for the match officials to adjudicate.

Amend eighth definition on page 117:
• If a player jumps and knocks the ball back into the playing area (or if that player catches the ball and throws it back into the playing area) before landing in touch or touch-in-goal, play continues regardless of whether the ball reaches the plane of touch.
Reasoning: To simplify law and to increase ball-in-play time.

Add to definitions on page 117:
• If the ball-carrier reaches the plane of touch but returns the ball to the playing area without first landing in touch, play continues.
Reasoning: To simplify law and to increase ball-in-play time.

Add to sixth definition on page 117:
• In this case, if the ball has passed the plane of touch when it is caught, then the catcher is not deemed to have taken the ball into touch. If the ball has not passed the plane of touch when it is caught or picked up, then the catcher is deemed to have taken the ball into touch, regardless of whether the ball was in motion or stationary.
Reasoning: To simplify law and to increase ball-in-play time.

With the exception of the change to Law 3, which is only for 15s, all these trials apply equally to 15s and Sevens.

In addition, the following trials were approved for law changes in sevens only:

• Finals should last no longer than seven minutes each half (rationale is player welfare â€" the evidence shows that a disproportionate number of injuries take place in the second half of finals. Injuries per minute are higher in the second half of finals as opposed to the first half and throughout normal matches of seven minutes each way.)
• Referee Video Referral (RVR) to be taken out of on-field referees’ hands with the ultimate decision being taken by the TMO â€" often difficult to see the screen and make a call. The RVR protocol remains unchanged. The TMO will be one of the pool of tournament referees
• The restart kick must be taken within 30 seconds of a penalty kick or dropped goal being attempted where the kick is successful or goes dead.
• Teams must form a lineout within 15 seconds from the time the referee indicates the place where the throw-in will take place.
• Teams must be ready to form a scrum within 15 seconds from the time the referee indicates the mark of the scrum.
• A penalty or free-kick must be taken within 30 seconds of being awarded."

http://www.worldrugby.org/news/205710?lang=en
 
I think the gist of most of the changes introduced are good for the game in terms of time wasting infringements however I don't think they have focussed their changes in the most significant areas.

There are definitely more pressing issues.

To increase ball-in-play time I would still like to see some changes on time taken for scrum sets and in particular the chronic resets.

The problem isn't necessarily with the laws per say but how offenders are dealt with. If a player offends once - penalty! Second offence -yellow! A good ref will know who is at fault - it shouldn't be a lottery.

Also - If pitches are of such poor quality that scrums cant be contested properly - the home union is fined a substantial % of the gate takings.

I would also like to have seen a reiteration of the law regarding the feed. Putting the ball in skew has got to be the most flagrant breaking of the law. Time to get tough on this! If the ref is more focussed on the dark arts of the front rows technique and antics then the feed can be administered by the AR who is probably best placed to adjudicate this aspect.

One last law to improve ball-in-play time is the time taken to convert penalty goals -1 minute or possession is turned over and a scrum taken.
 
Last edited:
>>>>Law 5 Time
Add to 5.7(e) If a penalty is kicked into touch after time has elapsed without touching another player, the referee allows the throw-in to be taken and play continues until the next time the ball becomes dead.
Reasoning: To discourage teams from infringing in the dying moments of the game.<<<<
I'm a bit puzzled over this one. Time and again we see the clock go red, a penalty is awarded, the ball is kicked into touch - game over. This would seem to contradict that. There are instances (and I have never grasped the nuance) when the ref has awarded a penalty after time and siad that there is no time fro the throw in - but I simply don't understand why
Mike
 
The changes in the laws that I would REAlly like to see - but never will.
Substitutes ONLY allowed for injured players. Only one scrum reset allowed; if it goes down again and the ref can't fault anybody - free kick to attacking team (yes, I know that would still invite skullduggery, but you're in trouble if the ref spots it and at least it would get the game moving.
No lifting in line-outs
No lifting to receive restarts
No jumping to catch the ball - taking players out in the air is acknowledged to be dangerous and sometimes even a fair contest in teh air can result in bad injuries. As things stand the receiving player is putting a would be tackler at a considerable disadvantge by jumping.
At least a free kick, preferably a penalty, for a crooked feed to the scrum to actually be awarded instead of ignored!
 

Latest posts

Top