Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
North Island vs South island
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umaga&#039;s Witness" data-source="post: 996640" data-attributes="member: 65365"><p>Main point being the towns and cities are not worth visiting, it's the nature you want to see. Auckland is ok, it has gotten better, It was more if you can't handle the constant nature and need to stop somewhere to eat, Auckland isn't bad. Wellington is the only town or city worth visiting really, and probably most are worth actively avoiding. I have just had to give advice to people before and they are quite resistant to me telling them not to bother going to towns/cities. They're like "where should I go", and I'm like "there's this really cool mountain", they look at me Funny and say "a mountain?", I say "yeah, it's like a really big lump of dirt", they're like "does that mean I'll get dirty?", I'm like "yeah but it's really beautiful", they're like "oh ok, so there's some cool buildings?", I'm like "it's a mountain", they're like "what's the food like?", I'm like "just go to Auckland".</p><p></p><p>and back to topic, looking at who plays for which super rugby team is fairly meaningless, as players just go wherever, It's not really a regional thing at all. The interest in a north south game would have to come from some regional representation. And yeah maybe there are better options than north vs south but mark robinson has said quite recently (this month some time) that a north South game is very likely to happen.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umaga's Witness, post: 996640, member: 65365"] Main point being the towns and cities are not worth visiting, it’s the nature you want to see. Auckland is ok, it has gotten better, It was more if you can’t handle the constant nature and need to stop somewhere to eat, Auckland isn’t bad. Wellington is the only town or city worth visiting really, and probably most are worth actively avoiding. I have just had to give advice to people before and they are quite resistant to me telling them not to bother going to towns/cities. They’re like “where should I go”, and I’m like “there’s this really cool mountain”, they look at me Funny and say “a mountain?”, I say “yeah, it’s like a really big lump of dirt”, they’re like “does that mean I’ll get dirty?”, I’m like “yeah but it’s really beautiful”, they’re like “oh ok, so there’s some cool buildings?”, I’m like “it’s a mountain”, they’re like “what’s the food like?”, I’m like “just go to Auckland”. and back to topic, looking at who plays for which super rugby team is fairly meaningless, as players just go wherever, It’s not really a regional thing at all. The interest in a north south game would have to come from some regional representation. And yeah maybe there are better options than north vs south but mark robinson has said quite recently (this month some time) that a north South game is very likely to happen. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
North Island vs South island
Top