Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Offensive Team Names
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cruz_del_Sur" data-source="post: 1058929" data-attributes="member: 55747"><p>No **** sherlock! Next time i'll bring the crayons. Maybe then you'll have a fair chance of grasping the point. </p><p>And arguing that just because someone feels offended the rest of the world should change accordingly is, well, brave. Someone feeling offended and something being offensive are not necessarily quite the same thing. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Over the years i've read some pretty ignorant things here. This has to be top 2. Easy. </p><p>That is a standard technique used and currently used at every level in mathematics and logic to prove/disprove congruence and consistency. </p><p>Calling it the equivalent of 'being silly' speaks volumes of you, not me. </p><p></p><p>The idea, which clearly eludes you, is that the principle should stand regardless of how far you stretch it (otherwise it is not a principle, by definition), and the further you stretch it the easier it is to gauge and/or expose its impact. </p><p>It's generally taught in any philosophy 101 course. Many math-related courses too. I could recommend a book or two. Maybe then you could avoid the nonsense. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>For now. But fair enough.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cruz_del_Sur, post: 1058929, member: 55747"] No **** sherlock! Next time i'll bring the crayons. Maybe then you'll have a fair chance of grasping the point. And arguing that just because someone feels offended the rest of the world should change accordingly is, well, brave. Someone feeling offended and something being offensive are not necessarily quite the same thing. Over the years i've read some pretty ignorant things here. This has to be top 2. Easy. That is a standard technique used and currently used at every level in mathematics and logic to prove/disprove congruence and consistency. Calling it the equivalent of 'being silly' speaks volumes of you, not me. The idea, which clearly eludes you, is that the principle should stand regardless of how far you stretch it (otherwise it is not a principle, by definition), and the further you stretch it the easier it is to gauge and/or expose its impact. It's generally taught in any philosophy 101 course. Many math-related courses too. I could recommend a book or two. Maybe then you could avoid the nonsense. For now. But fair enough. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Offensive Team Names
Top