Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Offensive Team Names
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ncurd" data-source="post: 811055" data-attributes="member: 72205"><p>So because Hollywood have stopped being ignorant it's okay for sports team to perpetuate the stereotype instead? I know that's not what you were saying exactly in response. But Hollywood getting better is not a reason for Cheifs being allowed to do it.</p><p>I'm not going to comment on NZ and I have about zero knowledge of it. </p><p></p><p>The first article was exactly that (but I don't have to agree entirely with someone to see they might have one or two valid points). </p><p></p><p>Here my questions what's wrong with anything suggested in article Tigs Man suggested is? Why is that not a better way to use the Cheifs name?</p><p></p><p>I agree they probably shouldn't be forced into making a decision based on two professors opinions (the second of whom is an actual native American). But that doesn't mean they shouldn't engage on some kind of fake outrage that it's unreasonable they should think about it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ncurd, post: 811055, member: 72205"] So because Hollywood have stopped being ignorant it's okay for sports team to perpetuate the stereotype instead? I know that's not what you were saying exactly in response. But Hollywood getting better is not a reason for Cheifs being allowed to do it. I'm not going to comment on NZ and I have about zero knowledge of it. The first article was exactly that (but I don't have to agree entirely with someone to see they might have one or two valid points). Here my questions what's wrong with anything suggested in article Tigs Man suggested is? Why is that not a better way to use the Cheifs name? I agree they probably shouldn't be forced into making a decision based on two professors opinions (the second of whom is an actual native American). But that doesn't mean they shouldn't engage on some kind of fake outrage that it's unreasonable they should think about it. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Offensive Team Names
Top