Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Pichot's message
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TRF_heineken" data-source="post: 924624" data-attributes="member: 40658"><p>[USER=45598]@The Alpha Bro[/USER], I think you're nailing it on the head here with this above post.</p><p></p><p>While WR, FIFA, ICC are all international sporting bodies and can make their own laws regarding the sport and how it's governed. They can't ever make laws that's above a country's laws. If we use the residency law as an example. The Sporting Entity can make a law and have a different time period to that of an individual country but it may cause problems.</p><p></p><p>If a country now makes a law that a person must be 7 years physically residing (domicilium citandi et executandi) in that country before being granted residency, the Sporting entity's law of 3 or 5 years will mean absolutely nothing to that individual country as the person will only be qualified as a resident after the 7 year prescribed law.</p><p></p><p>I think what we have to do here, to get more of an equal ground between law and logic is to look at maximum and minimum periods, and how that can be implemented.</p><p></p><p>forget about the grandparents rule or descendant rule or whatever other rule there is and purely look at the skeleton of the law. and how to qualify. There is a period involved and by not complying to that period you can't qualify. Simple.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TRF_heineken, post: 924624, member: 40658"] [USER=45598]@The Alpha Bro[/USER], I think you're nailing it on the head here with this above post. While WR, FIFA, ICC are all international sporting bodies and can make their own laws regarding the sport and how it's governed. They can't ever make laws that's above a country's laws. If we use the residency law as an example. The Sporting Entity can make a law and have a different time period to that of an individual country but it may cause problems. If a country now makes a law that a person must be 7 years physically residing (domicilium citandi et executandi) in that country before being granted residency, the Sporting entity's law of 3 or 5 years will mean absolutely nothing to that individual country as the person will only be qualified as a resident after the 7 year prescribed law. I think what we have to do here, to get more of an equal ground between law and logic is to look at maximum and minimum periods, and how that can be implemented. forget about the grandparents rule or descendant rule or whatever other rule there is and purely look at the skeleton of the law. and how to qualify. There is a period involved and by not complying to that period you can't qualify. Simple. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Pichot's message
Top