Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
Player Rating Game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BigTen" data-source="post: 124958"><p>Regardless of my thoughts of whether any NH'er should be rated above 90 or not I honestly hope that there are lots of NH players that are.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>The reason?</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>With the ai looking even worse than '06 the only way most people will get a challenge out of this game is if most players are rated close to 100.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Although thinking about it now - maybe it would be good not to rate any player above 80. And then give two or three players per nation really high ratings. This would affect how nations would play - for example if a team had really highly rated wingers you would need to play an expansive game to play to the full potential of that side. Likewise if you were playing against a side with really good wingers you would need to adapt your style to ensure that you keep their wingers in check.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>But anyway back to business...</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>(Tana Umaga) 86</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Reuben Thorne?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BigTen, post: 124958"] Regardless of my thoughts of whether any NH'er should be rated above 90 or not I honestly hope that there are lots of NH players that are. The reason? With the ai looking even worse than '06 the only way most people will get a challenge out of this game is if most players are rated close to 100. Although thinking about it now - maybe it would be good not to rate any player above 80. And then give two or three players per nation really high ratings. This would affect how nations would play - for example if a team had really highly rated wingers you would need to play an expansive game to play to the full potential of that side. Likewise if you were playing against a side with really good wingers you would need to adapt your style to ensure that you keep their wingers in check. But anyway back to business... (Tana Umaga) 86 Reuben Thorne? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
Player Rating Game
Top