Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Premiership Rugby / Premiership Cup
Premiership Rugby 20/21 - Rd 18
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Welsh Exile" data-source="post: 1038613" data-attributes="member: 82670"><p>Nah, fair enough, I shouldn't have said that comment about the panel. They're still wrong, but it wasn't called for.</p><p></p><p>I obviously accept that technically speaking he's been found innocent of any intentional stamping but this is what I'm debating/challenging.</p><p></p><p>As TRF believes (or any rational person in my opinion) there is clearly intent, that much is obvious and not really debatable for me it's so clear, it just becomes a matter of whether it was meant for his head or not.</p><p></p><p>If he said to the panel "I didn't mean to stamp on his head I was aiming for his shoulder" what do you think they would've done? So it's a matter of truth and whether it was told. I doubt it but it's done now and the ban is more or less fair. Maybe he did tell the truth and they were happy that he was the one being fouled in the first place?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Welsh Exile, post: 1038613, member: 82670"] Nah, fair enough, I shouldn’t have said that comment about the panel. They’re still wrong, but it wasn’t called for. I obviously accept that technically speaking he’s been found innocent of any intentional stamping but this is what I’m debating/challenging. As TRF believes (or any rational person in my opinion) there is clearly intent, that much is obvious and not really debatable for me it’s so clear, it just becomes a matter of whether it was meant for his head or not. If he said to the panel “I didn’t mean to stamp on his head I was aiming for his shoulder” what do you think they would’ve done? So it’s a matter of truth and whether it was told. I doubt it but it’s done now and the ban is more or less fair. Maybe he did tell the truth and they were happy that he was the one being fouled in the first place? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Premiership Rugby / Premiership Cup
Premiership Rugby 20/21 - Rd 18
Top