Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Proposed law changes - 2024 edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Which Tyler" data-source="post: 1181323" data-attributes="member: 73592"><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.world.rugby/news/916218/world-rugby-reveals-phased-plan-to-enhance-rugbys-global-appeal[/URL]</p><p></p><p>Hear hear on all of those - the laws exist, just apply the damned things!</p><p></p><p>I know I'm in a minority on this, but I don't particularly like the idea of completely removing the clause about being played onside by the opponents - adapt it, sure, but not simply remove (I'd say to actively retreat (no slowest-walk-ever competitions) to their own half, &/ allow 10m rather than 5m of ball movement to be put back onside.</p><p>Not scrummaging off a scrum free-kick seems... fine, I guess (I'd rather downgrade SOME scrum penalties to FC whilst we're at it, but freely admit that I don't know what's happening in scrums)</p><p>Wait - I thought the Croc roll was already illegal?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>"shot clock" expansion seems fine, been asking for something similar for a while. Of course, it'll just mean that every set piece, someone takes a knee and gets some ice spray whilst they talk tactics, but at least the clock will be off - 80 minute game is soon going to take 180 minutes to complete!</p><p>I'd rather make marks harder and less frequent than allowing more of them - but I guess they want to stop the ruck, caterpillar, clear sequence.</p><p>Is anyone (not Australian) that put off by mauling?</p><p>Protect the SH at the scrum - yes, absolutely - stop those silly bollockses just tackling each other whilst the ball is tied up. Stop the defending SH advancing beyond the hips of the flanker would do that, whilst keeping him close enough to tackle a pick and go for 8 or 9 down his channel.</p><p>For rucks and mauls, if your SH needs more protection, then it's your forwards' job to provide it. I guess I'm happy to try things, but am instinctively against these bits.</p><p>Yes please. Just throw someone up, and make sure they can't cheat (too much).</p><p></p><p>Consistency in the disciplinary process can only be a good thing</p><p>Please stop those shoulder charges into static and defenceless players (I believe there's already a law covering this, 9.11 "Dangerous Play" - just add it to the examples given</p><p>TMO remit should be being tinkered with quarterly anyway</p><p>Replacements - interesting, no idea how that's likely to come out.</p><p>Fan Experience - ref-mic would be the big one, broadcast it to any radio app.</p><p>Tackle height - this should really be in phase two - to be applied in the next season after May 9th meeting. Why the hell isn't it?</p><p></p><p>Wait and see</p><p></p><p>I've always liked this suggestion (no bias from being a SH who hated box kicks); I also like the suggestion of "no players (either team) can be added to the ruck once the ref has called that the ball is won.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Which Tyler, post: 1181323, member: 73592"] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.world.rugby/news/916218/world-rugby-reveals-phased-plan-to-enhance-rugbys-global-appeal[/URL] Hear hear on all of those - the laws exist, just apply the damned things! I know I'm in a minority on this, but I don't particularly like the idea of completely removing the clause about being played onside by the opponents - adapt it, sure, but not simply remove (I'd say to actively retreat (no slowest-walk-ever competitions) to their own half, &/ allow 10m rather than 5m of ball movement to be put back onside. Not scrummaging off a scrum free-kick seems... fine, I guess (I'd rather downgrade SOME scrum penalties to FC whilst we're at it, but freely admit that I don't know what's happening in scrums) Wait - I thought the Croc roll was already illegal? "shot clock" expansion seems fine, been asking for something similar for a while. Of course, it'll just mean that every set piece, someone takes a knee and gets some ice spray whilst they talk tactics, but at least the clock will be off - 80 minute game is soon going to take 180 minutes to complete! I'd rather make marks harder and less frequent than allowing more of them - but I guess they want to stop the ruck, caterpillar, clear sequence. Is anyone (not Australian) that put off by mauling? Protect the SH at the scrum - yes, absolutely - stop those silly bollockses just tackling each other whilst the ball is tied up. Stop the defending SH advancing beyond the hips of the flanker would do that, whilst keeping him close enough to tackle a pick and go for 8 or 9 down his channel. For rucks and mauls, if your SH needs more protection, then it's your forwards' job to provide it. I guess I'm happy to try things, but am instinctively against these bits. Yes please. Just throw someone up, and make sure they can't cheat (too much). Consistency in the disciplinary process can only be a good thing Please stop those shoulder charges into static and defenceless players (I believe there's already a law covering this, 9.11 "Dangerous Play" - just add it to the examples given TMO remit should be being tinkered with quarterly anyway Replacements - interesting, no idea how that's likely to come out. Fan Experience - ref-mic would be the big one, broadcast it to any radio app. Tackle height - this should really be in phase two - to be applied in the next season after May 9th meeting. Why the hell isn't it? Wait and see I've always liked this suggestion (no bias from being a SH who hated box kicks); I also like the suggestion of "no players (either team) can be added to the ruck once the ref has called that the ball is won. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Proposed law changes - 2024 edition
Top