Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Razor blacks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umaga&#039;s Witness" data-source="post: 1173247" data-attributes="member: 65365"><p>Hmm, I dont really know honestly. I think it made more sense when super rugby was better than other comps and when New Zealand's style was vastly different to styles elsewhere in the world. </p><p></p><p>But it's complex.</p><p></p><p>I Think super rugby would be less popular if it didn't have the best players. That means NZ rugby loses more money. </p><p></p><p>So far we haven't had too many significant defections affecting the all blacks. mounga is the biggest one we've ever had though. I don't know, we could have the mounga rule (like the giteau rule).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umaga's Witness, post: 1173247, member: 65365"] Hmm, I dont really know honestly. I think it made more sense when super rugby was better than other comps and when New Zealand's style was vastly different to styles elsewhere in the world. But it's complex. I Think super rugby would be less popular if it didn't have the best players. That means NZ rugby loses more money. So far we haven't had too many significant defections affecting the all blacks. mounga is the biggest one we've ever had though. I don't know, we could have the mounga rule (like the giteau rule). [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Razor blacks
Top